Deficiency Index

New Glen Oaks Nursing Home, Inc

Glen Oaks, New York · CCN 335299

9 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
35
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2024
’12’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Queens
Medicare-certified since
1970

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 10, 2024

882 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.793.60
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.59—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$23,443 across 5 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD555.6%E222.2%F111.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B111.1%C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 35 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6402×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

  • F5531×

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6571×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6781×

    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at New Glen Oaks Nursing Home, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF640Aug 10, 2022

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessments were submitted and transmitted into the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in a timely manner. This was evident for 44 of 44 Residents reviewed for Resident Assessments. (Resident #s 26, 21, 11, 29, 52, 45, 16,48, 50, 8, 51, 33, 46, 28, 55, 32, 12, 1, 25, 31, 4, 7, 23, 19, 30, 44, 22, 27, 24, 14, 3, 17, 10, 54, 9, 5, 20, 18, 13, 15, 2, 47, 49, 53). Specifically, admission, annual, and quarterly MDS assessments were not submitted and transmitted within 14 calendar days after the assessments were completed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF553Jun 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 06/03/2024 to 06/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents were involved in developing the comprehensive care plan and making decisions about their care. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that residents were afforded the opportunity to participate in the Comprehensive Care Plan meeting. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Care Planning out of 17 total sampled residents (Resident #41, #23, and #48). The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan reviewed 2/2024 documented the Interdisciplinary team will update the team care plan after each quarterly assessment or reassessment review or more often if necessary. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jun 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 06/03/2024 to 06/10/2024, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was provided to the residents. Specifically, maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior were not provided to the residents. Specifically, on Unit 2 mismatched paint, unpainted walls, stained bathroom floors, dusty windowsills, a cracked wall, a sticky tabletop surface, and broken window blinds were observed. This was evident in multiple rooms on 1 of 2 units observed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jun 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 06/03/2024 to 06/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. Specifically, the care plan related to therapeutic activities was not revised quarterly. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for Activities out of 17 total sampled residents. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan reviewed 2/24 documented the team will update team care plan after each quarterly assessment or reassessment review or more often if necessary. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF678Jun 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 06/03/2024 to 06/10/2024, the facility did not ensure that the resident's wishes regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation were accurately documented. Specifically, the medical order and labelling of the medical record did not match. This was evident in 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Advanced Directives (Resident #23) out of 17 total sampled residents. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives revised/reviewed 3/24 documented that it is the resident's right to formulate an Advance Directive, and copies will be made and placed on the chart as well as communicated to the staff. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 35 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 10, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Aug 10, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 31, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jun 1, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jun 3, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Jun 27, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 11, 2013—4 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Jun 25, 2012—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction