Deficiency Index

Absolut Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation at A

Allegany, New York · CCN 335610

11 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
54
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
37
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ABSOLUT CARE
County
Cattaraugus · rural
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2025

488 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.283.60
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover37.9%48.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B112.5%C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 54 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Absolut Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation at A, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 17, 2026

    Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing unless clinically unavoidable for two (Resident #37 and #9) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #37 was admitted with a stage 1 pressure injury (intact skin with localized non-blanchable redness) on the bilateral buttocks on 07/02/2026. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF740Jul 17, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #6 did not have a psychiatry follow up visit as planned per the psychiatry consult recommendations. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF755Jul 17, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review completed during the survey, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained for one of one medication storage rooms. Specifically, on 07/13/2026, a controlled substance medication, Lyrica (pregabalin) (controlled substance used to treat pain and/or seizures) dose was unaccounted for, and additional controlled substance medications were not signed out or reconciled at the time of administration. Residents #7, #11, #14, #18, #27, and #37 were involved. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Jul 17, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the survey, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of infections for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (interventions designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms including gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). Specifically, staff did not wear proper personal protective equipment while providing incontinent care for Resident #1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Jul 9, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00385514) the facility did not ensure that residents were free from abuse and mistreatment for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #3 was witnessed to slap Resident #1's head during care.The finding is:The policy Abuse Prohibition revised 2/2023, documented residents have the right to be free from physical abuse and mistreatment. The facility will not condone any form of resident abuse.The policy and procedure Facility Incident/Abuse Investigation and Reporting revised 6/7/23, documented mistreatment means inappropriate treatment of a resident. Physical abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 54 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 17, 2026Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Oct 10, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Apr 28, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 17, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jul 17, 2015Standard15 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 10, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Jul 25, 2013—3 findings
  • Jul 19, 2012—3 findings
  • Nov 18, 2011—13 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction