Deficiency Index

Troy Victorian Rehabilitation & Nursing Care CNTR

Troy, New York · CCN 335377

39 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
181
Surveys
39
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
11
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy11

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/39

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Rensselaer
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

May 18, 2026

175 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.963.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover57.4%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$240,652 across 3 penalties
Special focus
SFF Candidate

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ22.4%K—L—
Actual harmG11.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5058.8%E2428.2%F78.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 85 of the 181 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6095×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6565×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5844×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Troy Victorian Rehabilitation & Nursing Care CNTR, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 9, 2026

    Based on record reviews and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk of elopement remained under supervision for two (2) (Resident's #5 and #9) of four (4) residents reviewed for elopement risk. Specifically, (a.) Resident #5 left the faciity on [DATE] without the facility's knowledge and was not located until hours later; and (b.) Resident #9 was able to exit the facility on 11/16/2025 and was located shortly after on facility grounds. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to Resident #5's health and safety, and no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #9.This is evidenced by:The policy and procedure titled, Elopement, dated 07/14/2021, stated if an employee… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 5, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Case # NY00345181), the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards and adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. Specifically, on 6/11/2024, Resident #1 was observed leaving the facility through the front entrance. The facility did not put any measures in place to prevent further elopements. Subsequently, on 6/14/2024, Resident #1 was observed in the parking lot by facility staff and was brought back into the facility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 9, 2025

    Based on record review and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00344251 and NY00355131), the facility did not ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for three (3) (Resident #s 48, 78, and 416) of nine (9) residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #416, who was a two (2)-person maximum assist with mechanical lift for transfers, was transferred by two (2) Certified Nurse Aides via stand pivot on 6/04/2024. Resident #416 was reportedly lowered to the floor during the transfer from chair to bed and later that evening diagnosed with a left femur (leg bone) fracture. (b.) Resident #48, who was known to have aggressive behaviors, struck Resident #78 on their eye while grabbing a personal item from Resident #78 on 9/22/2024. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF584May 9, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (Case #s NY00353853, NY00355929, NY00356190, and NY00357360), the facility did not provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services on two (2) of two (2) resident units. Specifically, floors, walls, ceilings and tables were not clean or maintained. This is evidenced by: During observations on 5/05/2024 at 10:00 AM, the second-floor unit corridor floors were sticky when walked upon. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF656May 9, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification and abbreviated survey (case # ' s NY00362000 and NY00379563), the facility did not develop and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 16 (Residents #s 6, 10, 13, 28, 31, 37, 52, 61, 70, 72, 86, 103, 107, 262, 413, and 415) of 32 residents reviewed for Care Plans. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 181 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 18, 2026Standard and complaint16 findings
  • Mar 9, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 9, 2025Standard28 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 5, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 25, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 7, 2023Complaint5 findings
Show the 31 earlier surveys
  • Apr 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Apr 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 27, 2021Standard and complaint16 findings
  • Apr 15, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 23, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 30, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 9, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 28, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • May 17, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jun 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 4, 2015Standard12 findings · 4 harm
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Apr 11, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 9, 2013—3 findings
  • Jun 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 2, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 17, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 30, 2012—3 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 7, 2012—14 findings
  • Oct 3, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2011—1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2011—5 findings
  • May 6, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction