Transitional Care Of Seattle
Seattle, Washington · CCN 505534
18 surveys since 2021, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 65
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 165
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- King
- Medicare-certified since
- 2020
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jan 30, 2026
283 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 7.83 | 3.97 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.71 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.5% | 45.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.4% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2969.0% | E1228.6% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Transitional Care Of Seattle, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF756Jun 28, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address Drug Regimen Review (DRR) recommendations for 2 (April and May 2021) of 2 months reviewed. The facility's failure to ensure the DRR recommendations for Resident 1's blood thinning medication was provided to and reviewed by the physician, resulted in Resident 1 suffering a debilitating stroke that left Resident 1 unable to articulate words, formulate ideas, and understand the spoken word. In addition, Resident 1 suffered numbness, tingling, and weakened legs. This failure placed all other residents at risk for harm, related to inappropriate medication dosages, inappropriate drug administration, and/or lack of clinical and/or laboratory monitoring. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 31, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the risk of hot liquids, adequately supervise, and initiate interventions for the safe use of hot liquids for a resident who required staff assistance for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents. Resident 1 experienced harm when they sustained a burn to their left lower lip. Findings included . Review of the facility Microwave Reheating Guidelines dated October 2017 showed foods and fluids heated in the microwave were served to residents at safe temperatures. Safety steps listed included temperature is taken prior to service to the resident. Hot beverages and hot foods are served to residents at less than or equal to 150 degrees Fahrenheit. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 15, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient supervision by ensuring. resident rooms were free from unapproved hazardous electrical appliances and equipment for 5 of 77 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 7, and 8). This failed practice caused harm to Resident 1 who spilled hot water from an electric kettle, experienced a burn their right foot, and placed all residents at risk for potential injury. Findings included . Review of the facility's Resident Handbook, revised June 2020, showed that some items, such as electrical appliances and equipment, are potential fire hazards and must be approved by the center prior to use. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Sep 30, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents 1, 2, 3 & 4 ) of 4 residents reviewed for hydration, maintained acceptable parameters of hydration status or were adequately monitored for hydration status. Failure to ensure accurate intakes were documented, accurately monitor fluid intake, and notify physicians of changes, placed the residents at risk for fluid imbalance, medical complications [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings included . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 17, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 (Residents 1) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice and/or had appropriate and timely interventions in place based on individual risks, to promote healing of existing pressure injuries and prevent new pressure injuries from developing. These failures contributed to Resident 1 experiencing discomfort and a pressure ulcer and placed residents at risk of extended healing time, and development of additional pressure ulcers/skin issues. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 65 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 30, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Sep 23, 2025Standard15 findings
- Nov 18, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 13, 2024Standard15 findings
- May 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 15, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 2, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Sep 30, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 28, 2021Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 10, 2021Infection control4 findings · 1 harm
- May 27, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Apr 5, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 11, 2021Complaint5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction