Deficiency Index

Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West

Seattle, Washington · CCN 505270

31 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
132
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
137
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AVAMERE
County
King
Medicare-certified since
1982

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Mar 9, 2026

245 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.073.97
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover53.5%45.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$29,820 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K11.7%L—
Actual harmG11.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3560.3%E1932.8%F23.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 58 of the 132 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8805×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8813×

    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Feb 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement Infection Control (IC) and Infection Prevention (IP) practices and initiate outbreak management interventions to prevent transmission of COVID-19 (a highly contagious infectious disease, causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing, that could result in severe impairment or death) for 29 of 39 current sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, & 29) who tested positive for COVID-19 and some who had respiratory symptoms including cough, sore throat, headache,… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Mar 21, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate contributing factors, rule out abuse/neglect, and implement appropriate corrective actions after a resident elopement (unsafe exiting of the building to an unsecure area without direct supervision) for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident 1) reviewed for elopement. This failure placed Resident 1 in immediate jeopardy for failing to investigate and identify system failures that allowed the resident to elope without staff knowledge, and placed all residents identified as elopement risk at further risk for harm and injury related to leaving the facility unsupervised. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Oct 7, 2024

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to protect resident's skin from injury, accurately identify, assess, document, and report changes in skin integrity for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury (PU/PI). Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed five new PU/PIs and pain. This failed practice placed residents at risk for skin injuries, PUs/PIs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The National Institutes of Health (NIH) website showed a Pressure Injury (PI) was localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissues usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury could present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 21, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards. The facility failed to ensure supervision, development and implementation of policies and procedures to ensure safety devices such as footrests (FR) were in place on residents' wheelchairs (W/C), which placed residents (3, 17, 2, & 18) at risk of injury and contributed to Resident 3's fall and significant injury when their foot hit the ground, when propelled in their W/C without FRs. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 2 & Resident 10) who smoked and failed to ensure medications were secured on 1 of 6 medication carts which placed residents at risk for accidents, injury, and diminished quality of life. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 10, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases, including COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness, in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing, and could result in impairment or death) for 41 of 42 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, & 41) reviewed who tested positive for COVID-19 during an facility outbreak and 1 resident (Resident 42) who was reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP- specific protocols based on disease transmission to help… […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 132 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2025Standard20 findings
  • Oct 7, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 22, 2024Standard22 findings
  • Feb 6, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 20, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 10, 2023Infection control3 findings
  • Mar 21, 2023Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Feb 3, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Jul 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 27, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jul 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 22, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jan 31, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Oct 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Oct 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 3, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jan 31, 2014—2 findings
  • Dec 27, 2013Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2011—9 findings
  • May 5, 2011—2 findings
  • Apr 27, 2011—1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2010—1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2010—16 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction