Deficiency Index

Life Care Center of Kirkland

Kirkland, Washington · CCN 505334

40 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
147
Surveys
40
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/40

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
190
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
County
King
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.

Last survey on record

Jun 16, 2026

146 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.873.97
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.05—
Annual nurse turnover50.5%45.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$53,560 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG34.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4572.6%E1117.7%F34.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 62 of the 147 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6095×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6105×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F8805×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Life Care Center of Kirkland, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 29, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, provide timely treatment, and implement pressure relieving interventions to prevent worsening of skin condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue that occurs due to prolonged pressure on the skin). Resident 1, who was at an increased risk of skin breakdown, experienced harm when a wound on their sacrum (triangular-shaped bone in the lower back located between the hip bones) had not been identified on their admission skin assessment, developed into an avoidable unstageable pressure injury (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) that worsened requiring debridement (surgical removal of dead or infected tissue… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 1, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services timely to treat and prevent further skin breakdown from a pressure ulcer/pressure injury (PU/PI - an injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) and failed to initiate timely antibiotic medication to treat PU/PI wound infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for PU/PI. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had a rapid deterioration of multiple PU/PIs that became infected and required hospitalization related to bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the blood), and placed other residents at risk for wound infection, delayed wound healing, and a diminished quality of life. Finding included . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684May 4, 2023

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 2 of 9 residents (Resident 39 & 146) reviewed for removal of Coban dressing (self-adherent elastic wrap, used to secure dressings, compress, or protect wound sites), weekly skin assessment, and conducting neurological/neuro checks (an assessment to monitor level of consciousness, movement of the eye, facial symmetry, motor assessment of the arms/legs) after an unwitnessed fall. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 13, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure caused harm to Resident 1 who sustained physical injuries, pain, and psychosocial harm in the form of fear and feeling unsafe at the facility. Findings included . Resident 1 was a long-term care resident at the facility. The resident's diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A review of Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident had impaired cognition and needed two-person extensive assistance for bed mobility and two-person total staff dependence with transfer. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 30, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and evaluate the increased risk for skin breakdown, evaluate the effectiveness of current treatment plan, follow written policy and procedures, and implement physician orders/timely interventions necessary to prevent development or worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pressure ulcers/pressure injury (PU/PI). These failures caused harm to Resident 1 whose identified pressure ulcers had worsened and who had developed additional pressure ulcers while at the facility. Findings included . […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 147 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Aug 29, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 32 earlier surveys
  • Sep 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2024Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Apr 24, 2024Complaint5 findings
  • Apr 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 13, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 11, 2022Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Apr 30, 2021Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard and complaint18 findings · 4 harm
  • Apr 25, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 26, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Oct 16, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 3, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 10, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jul 18, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Apr 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 13, 2013—2 findings
  • Mar 12, 2012—6 findings
  • Aug 31, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 4, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction