Hallmark Manor
Federal Way, Washington · CCN 505313
44 surveys since 2010, 20 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 300
- Surveys
- 44
- Harm or worse
- 20
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 147
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA
- County
- King
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
May 28, 2026
165 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.61 | 3.97 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.4% | 45.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $46,555 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3558.3% | E2033.3% | F35.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6372×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hallmark Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Apr 27, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate Basic Life Support, which included rapid defibrillation and early CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation), when Resident 1 experienced a change in condition that required an immediate staff response to address a medical emergency. This failure increased the likelihood of unsuccessful CPR and resulted in Resident 1's death. An Immediate Jeopardy was called on [DATE] and removed on [DATE] when staff were trained, mock drills conducted, and staff records were updated with documentation of current staff CPR cards. Findings included . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684May 28, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a full assessment, monitor, notify the provider and take timely action for a latent injury and a significant change in pain experience for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. Resident 1 who reported a popping noise after receiving care from staff and acute pain, experienced harm with increasing pain when there was a delay in transfer to the hospital for evaluation where they were diagnosed with a right ankle fracture. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 12, 2024
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent the occurrence of an avoidable pressure ulcer/pressure injury (PU/PI) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed an unstageable (a pressure injury that is a full thickness skin and tissue loss to which the extent of the tissue damage cannot be seen) wound to their right foot requiring hospital treatment and amputation. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 29, 2022
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, confirm planned fall interventions were implemented, functional, and effective to prevent falls for one (Resident 1) of four residents reviewed for accidents. These failures of the facility resulted in harm to Resident 1 and placed the other residents at risk for injury. Findings included . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 12/16/2021, showed Resident 1 had medically complex conditions and Alzheimer's dementia, was cognitively intact (BIMS score of 13), with no behaviors. According to this MDS the resident was independent, with set up only for transfers, walking in room, toileting, was steady moving on and off the toilet, and used a walker. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Aug 19, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the person designated to serve as the Dietary Manager (Staff C) had the proper training and qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff without the required competencies and skills to carry out food and nutrition services. Findings included . Review of the (undated) staff list showed Staff C (Dietary Manager) was employed by the facility on 08/07/2024. In an interview on 08/19/2024 at 9:48 AM, Staff A (Administrator) stated Staff C was required to have the ServSafe Manager Certification (verifies that a manager or person-in-charge has sufficient food safety knowledge to protect the public from foodborne illness) before being hired. […]
Read 39 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 39 of 300 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 28, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 13, 2025Standard19 findings
- Aug 19, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 12, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 10, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 6, 2024Standard18 findings
- Nov 8, 2022Standard17 findings
- Jun 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 36 earlier surveys
- Apr 27, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 29, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 3, 2020Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 2, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 15, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Apr 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 7, 2019Standard21 findings
- May 24, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Dec 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 18, 2018Standard and complaint55 findings · 4 harm
- Jun 1, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Mar 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 1, 2017Standard and complaint30 findings · 3 harm
- Mar 29, 2017Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jul 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2016Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
- May 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 4, 2015Standard and complaint20 findings
- Feb 7, 2014Standard15 findings
- Jan 7, 2014—1 finding
- Jul 9, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 11, 2012—8 findings
- Mar 26, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 2, 2012—1 finding
- Nov 18, 2011—20 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 9, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 22, 2010—11 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction