Deficiency Index

The Laurels of Middletown

Middletown, Ohio · CCN 365457

27 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
88
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
109
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Butler
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Sep 26, 2025

409 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.593.51
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover52.9%51.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG24.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2969.0%E819.0%F37.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 42 of the 88 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Laurels of Middletown, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 23, 2024

    Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing at the facility who receive their meals from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the facility kitchen with the Administration Aide (AA) #266 on 05/20/24 at 7:44 A.M., a trash can located underneath the kitchen hand washing sink which was soiled with splatter running down the sides. Observations revealed a pile of soiled and dirty dishtowels with multiple live gnats flying on and around the dishtowels. The kitchen floor appeared dirty with debris throughout. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 26, 2021

    Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interview, review of facility policies, and review of the facility legionella water prevention program, the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions for residents with Coronavirus (COVID-19) like symptoms. This affected four Residents (#8, #24, #46, and #72) and had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility also failed to have a sufficient legionella prevention plan. This had the potential to affect all the residents of the facility. The facility also failed to ensure staff washed their hands when distributing meals to residents. This affected two (#1 and #37) residents observed during meals. The census was 81. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Aug 6, 2026

    Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the water supplied to the shower room and resident rooms was maintained at a comfortable temperature. This affected 37 out of 37 residents (#9, #13, #14, #17, #18, #21, #25, #28, #29, #31, #33, #34, #39, #41, #44, #45, #48, #49, #52, #54, #56, #57, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #66, #67, #73, #78, #81, #82, #84, #85, #87, and #93) who resided on South Hall and utilized the shower room. The facility census was 90 residents. Findings include: Interview on 08/03/26 at 9:51 A.M. with Resident #29 confirmed the facility did not always have hot water available for residents.Interview on 08/05/26 at 2:11 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584May 23, 2024

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and sanitary environment for the residents. This affected four (#25, #36, #46 and #51) out of four residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Interview on 05/20/24 at 2:48 P.M. with Resident #46 revealed he was upset that his bed was not comfortable and felt as though it was broken. Resident #46 confirmed his mattress was not lying on the bed correctly. Resident #46 stated his bed does not face the television in his room and he must turn his head to the left to watch television. Resident #46 stated the brown wall beside his bed had a large white drywall substance on it for several months. Interview on 05/21/24 at 8:33 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641May 23, 2024

    Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected six (#01, #24, #41, #74, #82, and #92) residents out of the 25 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admitted [DATE] with medical diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, paranoid schizophrenia, psychotic disorder with delusions and seizures. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an annual MDS assessment, dated 03/28/24, revealed Resident #01 had severe cognitive impairment. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 88 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 26, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • May 23, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Apr 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Oct 23, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 15, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard20 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 14, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Nov 12, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 6, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2012—9 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 29, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction