Deficiency Index

The Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation Center

Ashland, Ohio · CCN 365093

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Ashland · rural
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 18, 2024

844 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.733.51
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.98—
Annual nurse turnover31.1%51.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2074.1%E311.1%F13.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.7%C13.7%
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 61 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6882×

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5531×

    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 27, 2023

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, medical record review, hospital documentation review, resident and staff interview, review of a personnel file, review of a disciplinary action document, review of an investigation, policy review, and review of facility initiated corrective action, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and assistance was provided to prevent a resident fall. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #104 was transferred by a mechanical (Hoyer) lift using only one staff member to assist, and subsequently fell , causing a facial laceration requiring sutures and a fractured right leg which required hospitalization and surgical intervention. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 13, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record reviews, facility policy reviews, and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards related to proper hand hygiene, use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and during cleansing of resident-shared glucometers. This affected three residents (#7, #64, and #67) of 11 residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 118. Findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, obstructive uropathy, and dementia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Mar 3, 2022

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to remove expired medications from the medications carts and medication storage rooms. This affected three of six medication carts and two of three medication storage rooms. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation of Windsor medication cart on 03/01/22 at 7:55 A.M. revealed a bottle of CoQ 10 was found with an expiration date of 01/2022 and a bottle of aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) was located in the cart with an expiration date of 11/2021. Observation of the Windsor [NAME] Hall medication room on 03/01/22 at 8:22 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store and secure medications. This affected eight residents (#21, #32, #40, #67, #72, #76, #98, and #129) and had the potential to affect the residents residing on the Continuing Care Front Hall, Continuing Care Back Hall, and Memory Care units. The facility census was 118. Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/10/26 at 4:14 P.M. of medication storage with Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor #375 of the Continuing Care medication storage refrigerator revealed there were two applesauce containers and four cans of beer sitting next to several Haldol (an antipsychotic medication) injections, insulin pens and rectal suppositories. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF881Jul 18, 2024

    Based on infection control tracking, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship practices in prescribing antimicrobials. This affected 17 (Resident #6, #7, #9, #21, #27, #40, #51, #55, #69, #57, #70, #73, #76, #78, #83, #101, and #107) of 57 resident entries for antimicrobial treatments initiated in May and June 2024. The facility census was 119. Findings include: Review of infection control tracking for May 2024 revealed there were 32 antimicrobial (antibiotic and antifungal) treatments tracked for the month. The treatments were prescribed from a variety of sources that include from the hospital upon admission, emergency room prescribers, hospice prescribers, and the facility's prescribers. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 13, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jul 18, 2024Standard7 findings
  • Nov 27, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 3, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Oct 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2019Standard22 findings
  • Jun 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 22, 2018Standard4 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Aug 14, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2012—4 findings
  • Jan 6, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction