Deficiency Index

Versailles Rehabilitation and Health Care Center

Versailles, Ohio · CCN 365900

25 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
57
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
112
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Darke · rural
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2026

124 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.003.51
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover51.2%51.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2083.3%E28.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C14.2%
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 57 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Versailles Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 30, 2022

    Based on medical record review, staff and family interview, observations, review of facility electronic screening data, review of screening temperature logs, policy review, review of a glucometer manufacturer instructions, review of information the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) and review of information from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the facility failed to ensure all visitors were screened upon entrance to the facility for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) signs and symptoms. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. The facility failed to appropriately disinfect a glucometer with the appropriate disinfectant after residents use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF603May 8, 2025

    Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, observation, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure residents had orders and were assessed for secured units resulting in involuntary seclusion. This affected two (#60 and #180) of two residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion and had the potential to affect 13 additional residents (#3, #4, #5, #7, #17, #26, #32, #34, #35, #62, #68, #73, and #76) residing in the secured mental health unit (MHU) that did not orders for and were not assessed for admission to the secured MHU. The census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/26/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 23, 2022

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 70 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Observations on 05/16/22 from 8:07 A.M. to 8:20 A.M. of the kitchen, with Dietary Manager #394 present, revealed the following food items located in the refrigerator were not dated: a bowl of salsa, a bag of lettuce, a bin of chopped onions, one large tub of sliced cheese, zip locked bag with 10 cooked hamburger patties, a zip locked back with one pound of deli ham, a bin of chopped pears, and a zip lock back of 12 hard boiled eggs. Dietary Manager #394 verified undated food items. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 8, 2021

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement their droplet isolation policy to potentially prevent the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This affected four (#16, #17, #24 and #38) of four sampled residents reviewed for infection control. Facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed she was admitted [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score was 10 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Jul 8, 2026

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, Hospice provider interview, review of facility incident investigation report, review of Hospice documentation, review of facility self reported incidents (SRI's) and policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. This affected one (#85) resident out of three reviewed for injuries. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, dementia with behavioral disturbances, schizophrenia, and heart failure. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #85 was on Hospice services and expired [DATE]. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 57 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 8, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Feb 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • May 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Oct 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Mar 30, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 8, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 9, 2018Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 1, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Oct 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • May 21, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2013—5 findings
  • Jan 4, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2011—2 findings
  • Sep 23, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction