Covenant Village Care Center
Cincinnati, Ohio · CCN 366399
18 surveys since 2014, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 53
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 107
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Hamilton
- Medicare-certified since
- 2012
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.65 | 3.51 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.0% | 51.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2167.7% | E619.4% | F13.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C26.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Covenant Village Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 10, 2024
Based on closed medical record review, staff interviews, interview with Wound Nurse Practitioner (WNP) #175, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to adequately assess and monitor residents' skin and failed to timely identify pressure ulcers (a pressure ulcer is a localized injury of the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 9, 2022
Based on medical record review, review of the hospital record, resident and staff interview, review of a [MEDICATION(S)] Plus Medical Encyclopedia document, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to safely and properly turn a resident during incontinence care. Actual Harm occurred when State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #50 rolled Resident #01 away from her with no guards and Resident #01 rolled out of a raised bed onto the floor resulting in bilateral femur fractures with a dislocated right ankle requiring a five day hospital stay. This affected one (Resident #01) out of three residents reviewed for falls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 11, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents consuming food prepared in the kitchen. No residents in the facility were nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 104. Findings include:1. Observation on 06/08/26 at 8:55 A.M. of the ice machine located in the kitchen revealed small black spots on the inside upper lip of the ice machine. These black spots wiped off of this lip when rubbed with a clean paper towel.During an interview on 06/08/26 at 8:55 A.M. the Dietary Director (DD) #17 confirmed the existence of black spots on the inside upper lip of the ice machine which wiped off when rubbed with a clean paper towel. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF919Feb 8, 2024
Based on medical record reviews, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in working order on the facility's 200-hall. This affected 12 residents (#12, #14, #19, #23, #32, #42, #54, #57, #59, #74, #91, and #94) of 27 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #14 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, weakness, macular degeneration, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility and toileting and was dependent on staff for transfers. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jun 11, 2026
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when staff stood over residents as they fed them lunch. This affected two residents (#26 and #48) of twenty four reviewed for dining observation. The facility census was 104.Findings include:1. Medical record review of Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 02/01/25 with diagnoses including; Huntington's disease, ataxia, and dysphagia. Review of the care plan dated 01/30/23 revealed Resident #25 was dependent for eating and required one person assistance with being fed.Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent upon staff for bringing food and/or drink to mouth.2. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 53 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 11, 2026Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 7, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Nov 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 10, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 8, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Apr 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 9, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Dec 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 13, 2020Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jan 4, 2019Standard4 findings
- Mar 12, 2018Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 1, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jul 18, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 16, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 5, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2014Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Kingston of MiamisburgMiamisburgno harm findings
- O'Neill Healthcare LakewoodLakewoodno harm findings
- Versailles Rehabilitation and Health Care CenterVersaillesno harm findings
- The Gables of Marysville Health and RehabilitationMarysvilleno harm findings
- The Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation CenterAshland1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction