The Estates at Chateau LLC
Minneapolis, Minnesota · CCN 245222
33 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 162
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 69
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Hennepin
- Medicare-certified since
- 1978
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
May 14, 2026
179 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.09 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.74 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.7% | 41.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $35,565 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4182.0% | E36.0% | F36.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C24.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Estates at Chateau LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF610Jun 6, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety by allowing former resident FR4, who had been discharged , to repeatedly gain unauthorized entry through an unsecured door without staff awareness, resulting in non-consensual contact (a kiss) involving Resident R5 and misappropriation of property from Resident R7; this systemic failure placed all 61 residents at risk and resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. In addition, the facility failed to protect two residents (R1 and R2) from abuse when R3 had a verbal and physical altercation with R1, which escalated to a physical incident with R2 later that day. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 3, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to prevent an unintentional fire related to 1 of 1 resident (R1) who set fire to oxygen when she was smoking in her room. R1 remained in possession of a lighter and cigarettes after the fire, placing all 63 residents at likelihood of serious harm or death. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/29/26 when the facility failed to ensure R1's smoking materials were secured per the care plan, resulting in R1 lighting a cigarette in her room, with oxygen in use, and igniting an unintended fire. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 18, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and timely removal of facility food stored in refrigerators was completed to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerator and cooler temperatures were properly monitored and maintained to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who consumed meals from the main kitchen.Findings include:UNLABLED FOODDuring the initial kitchen observation with the dietary aid (DA)-A on 9/15/25 at 11:41 a.m., the following foods were found in a double-door refrigerator in the first-floor kitchen.-One gallon of skim milk, half full, manufacture expired date 9/10/25.-Unlabeled open plastic bag of pre-made salad… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 15, 2024
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and timely removal of facility food stored in refrigerators and freezers was completed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure facility food was stored in a manner to reduce the risk of physical cross-contamination and potential foodborne illness. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all food items were properly covered when served to residents to reduce and/or prevent the risk of foodborne illness. These facility failures had the potential to affect all 65 residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the third-floor unit refrigerator temperatures were properly monitored and maintained to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Aug 15, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) program identified and implemented ongoing, effective actions or monitoring to promote proper food storage (i.e., labeling, dating) and handling in 1 of 1 main production kitchen and various unit-based refrigerators despite known quality issues in this area and similar, repeated non-compliance with Federal regulations being identified for multiple years in a row during the recertification survey process. This had potential to affect all 65 residents, staff and visitors who consumed food at the care center. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 162 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 3, 2026Standard9 findings
- May 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 3, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 18, 2025Standard12 findings
- Jun 18, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jun 6, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- May 14, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Sep 18, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Aug 15, 2024Standard12 findings
- May 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 21, 2023Standard13 findings
- May 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Aug 5, 2022Standard and complaint17 findings
- Feb 22, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Dec 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 13, 2020Standard5 findings
- Jan 2, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2019Standard12 findings
- Dec 7, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Dec 21, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 31, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 27, 2017Standard15 findings
- Aug 17, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 23, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 7, 2013—9 findings
- Oct 19, 2012—6 findings
- Feb 9, 2012—8 findings
- Oct 3, 2011—1 finding
- Dec 16, 2010—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction