Deficiency Index

The Villas at Robbinsdale

Robbinsdale, Minnesota · CCN 245417

35 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
161
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
County
Hennepin
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jul 17, 2026

115 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.443.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.80—
Annual nurse turnover30.9%41.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$89,050 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3774.0%E36.0%F612.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.0%C12.0%
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 161 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6847×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8806×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6852×

    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Villas at Robbinsdale, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 17, 2026

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide supervision and care planned individualized interventions resulting in the risk for serious harm, injury impairment or death for 1 of 5 residents (R1) who was an elopement risk, was actively attempting to leave the facility, and succeeded with eloping on 3/7/26. R1 was located one hour and 20 minutes later, by the police, about 5 blocks from the facility. In addition, to R1 in immediate jeopardy, the facility failed to develop supervision and care planned individualized interventions with the potential for harm that is not immediate jeopardy for 3 of 3, residents (R3, R4, R5) reviewed for elopement risks. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Aug 25, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement all suggested mitigation efforts based on Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) recommended guidelines to ensure prevention, and minimize the transmission of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). KPC producing CRE is a type of bacteria that can cause serious infections that can be hard to treat; most often spread person-to-person in healthcare settings specifically through contact with the infected or colonized people through contact with wounds or stool. The facility had seven residents with active KPC-producing CRE. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Jul 14, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure Centers for Disease Control (CDC) transmission based precautions guidelines were followed to prevent and minimize the transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE-type of bacteria that can cause serious infections that can be hard to treat; most often spread person-to-person in healthcare settings specifically through contact with the infected or colonized people through contact with wounds or stool) for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) who remained in the building and R5 and R6 who discharged from the facility that had confirmed or history of CRE results; failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use to prevent the spread of CRE for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2); failed to ensure education was… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF690Jun 2, 2023

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide follow-up appointments with a urologist for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for indwelling catheter use. This resulted in actual harm to R1 when he developed a urinary tract infection (UTI), became septic, and was hospitalized . Findings include: R1's Admission Record dated 11/14/22, indicated R1's diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. The MDS also indicated R1 had an indwelling Foley catheter, required total assistance for transfers and toileting, and was cognitively intact. R1's care plan initiated 11/14/22, indicated R1 had neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Dec 30, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the worsening of open areas on the skin, as well as the development of new open areas for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin breakdown. This resulted in actual harm to R1 when he sustained moisture associated skin damage (MASD, damage to skin when it is in contact to moisture for too long) breakdown on his buttocks that worsened, and developed two new areas of MASD breakdown. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet printed on 12/30/21, indicated R1 had a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R1's Braden Scale (skin risk assessment) dated 12/1/21, indicated R1's was at low risk for skin breakdown. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 161 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 17, 2026Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Mar 17, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 30, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 26, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 28, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Jan 31, 2024Complaint5 findings
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Nov 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 8, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Jun 2, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 30, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2019Standard11 findings
  • Dec 1, 2017Standard14 findings
  • Jan 12, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2015Standard19 findings
  • Feb 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Feb 27, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2013—4 findings
  • Feb 22, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2012—11 findings
  • Mar 3, 2011—15 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction