The Emeralds at Grand Rapids LLC
Grand Rapids, Minnesota · CCN 245495
37 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 203
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 2 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 77
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MONARCH HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Itasca · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1987
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jun 17, 2026
145 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.47 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.95 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 48.9% | 41.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $65,900 across 4 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J34.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4671.9% | E1015.6% | F34.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C11.6% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6897×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6845×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6983×
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Emeralds at Grand Rapids LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 4, 2026
Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed when R1 was care planned to use two staff for transfers with a mechanical lift and nursing assistant (NA)-A attempted a mechanical lift transfer with one staff, R1 fell from the sling onto the floor sustaining a left femur fracture, head laceration and injury to left toes. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when NA-A attempted a mechanical lift transfer with one staff, R1 fell from the sling onto the floor sustaining a left femur fracture, head laceration, and injury to left toes. R1 was care planned to use two staff for transfers with a mechanical lift and was identified on [DATE]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF803Mar 22, 2024
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide the physician ordered textured diet for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who subsequently choked and required the Heimlich Maneuver. This was an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who required hospitalization following the choking incident where she was determined to have aspirated and required mechanically assisted ventilation. The IJ began on 3/9/24, at approximately 6:30 p.m. when R1 was found by nursing assistant (NA)-A in the common area of the unit observed as pale, lips blue and unable to speak. R1 was administered the Heimlich Maneuver, suction and was sent to the hospital where she subsequently required mechanically assisted ventilation. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 13, 2023
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to maintain resident safety when a resident (R1) who was assessed to be at risk for elopement verbalized his intent to leave the facility, left without staff knowledge and was returned to the facility by two strangers. Further, R1 was allowed to discharge home against medical advice from the facility even though he had been assessed to have cognitive impairment and admitted due to recurrent falls. This resulted in an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for R1. The IJ began on 9/30/23, when R1 left the facility without staff knowledge. R1 was found by two strangers on a highly-trafficked four lane highway with a cut on his nose. Additionally, within two hours of R1' s return to the facility, R1 wanted to return home. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 7, 2024
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure an environment free from hazards. This resulted in actual harm to R1 who sustained a second degree burn when his knee rested against the baseboard heater and he was unable to move his knee or call for help. The deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included encephalopathy (disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected), Diabetes, transient ischemic attack (a short period of symptoms similar to those of a stroke) and a tracheostomy (a direct airway through an incision in the trachea). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 4, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure safety interventions were in-place, prior to a resident leave of absence (LOA), and additional interventions were developed for subsequent unapproved outings and/or intoxication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who left the facility for four hours, was sent to the emergency department (ED) when he returned, received intravenous (IV) fluids, and was diagnosed with [REDACTED]. Findings include: R1's Admission Record printed 3/4/21, indicated R1's [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set ((MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had intact cognition. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 203 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 17, 2026Standard5 findings
- Jun 4, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings
- Dec 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Apr 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 22, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- Mar 7, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 11, 2024Standard17 findings
- Dec 1, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 13, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 10, 2023Standard and complaint15 findings
- Jan 12, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Oct 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 9, 2021Standard8 findings
- Oct 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Mar 4, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 22, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Sep 24, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Sep 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2020Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jun 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Nov 14, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 29, 2019Standard16 findings
- May 9, 2019Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 10, 2018Standard7 findings
- Sep 14, 2017Standard6 findings
- Aug 8, 2016Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 18, 2015Standard10 findings
- Sep 18, 2014Standard22 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 24, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 18, 2013Standard12 findings
- May 17, 2012—7 findings
- Apr 14, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction