The Blossoms at White River Rehab & Nursing Center
Newport, Arkansas · CCN 045323
32 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 180
- Surveys
- 32
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 130
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER
- County
- Jackson · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.25 | 3.82 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.34 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.0% | 49.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,316 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D625.0% | E1562.5% | F28.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Blossoms at White River Rehab & Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 26, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a severely cognitively impaired resident to prevent elopement, and failed to ensure staff responded promptly to an exit door alarm and thoroughly check the area outside the building after a door alarm sounded for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents (Residents #1, #4, and #5) who were at risk for elopement. Consequently, Resident #1 eloped from the facility without staff knowledge, traveled across rough ground, and was found by law enforcement in a dehydrated state. It was determined the facility's past non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 13, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure spices stored in the cabinet or on a shelf in the storage room were dated for first-in-first out spice rotation; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 50 residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen (Total Census:53). The findings are: 1. On 03/06/2024 at 08:06 AM, the following observations were made in the kitchen: a. A pan of green beans is noted sitting on the stove top uncovered. The green beans were never covered while the initial tour was conducted, exposing it to possible cross-commination. b. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 15, 2022
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and dry storage for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; failed to ensure a freezer air vent was functioning properly to prevent ice buildup; failed to ensure frozen food items were kept frozen, expired food items were promptly removed/ discarded by the expiration or use by dates, and foods were dated when received to assure first in first out usage to prevent potential for food borne illness; failed to ensure leftover food items were maintained to promote food quality; failed to ensure Dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent the potential for cross contamination, and 2 of 2 ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 2, 2021
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items, foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered, sealed, labeled, and dated; 2 of 2 ice machines and 1 of 2 ice scoop holders were maintained in sanitary condition; expired food items were promptly removed / discarded by the expiration or use-by dates; and hot foods were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit on the steam table while awaiting service to prevent potential foodborne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF609Jun 18, 2026
Based on record review, document review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident abuse. Specifically, the facility investigated but did not report to the state survey agency (SSA) within 2 hours, a resident-to-resident altercation in which Resident #63 stabbed Resident #68 with an ink pen in the chest. The findings include: Resident #63 Review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #63 on 05/04/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, with other behavioral disturbance; unspecified psychosis; personal history of traumatic brain injury; personal history of other mental and behavioral disorders; schizoaffective disorder. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 180 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Standard3 findings
- Jun 26, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 2, 2025Standard2 findings
- Mar 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2024Standard7 findings
- Sep 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jul 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
- Jul 2, 2021Standard21 findings
- Dec 17, 2020Infection control5 findings
- Oct 30, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Jan 10, 2020Standard17 findings
- Apr 4, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 30, 2018Standard11 findings
- Sep 26, 2018Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Dec 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jul 18, 2017Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Jun 9, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Oct 14, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 1, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 29, 2016Standard4 findings
- Oct 15, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
- May 15, 2015Standard20 findings
- Dec 18, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jul 15, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jun 13, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
- Feb 20, 2014—2 findings
- Jan 23, 2014—12 findings
- Apr 5, 2013—7 findings
- Feb 17, 2012—3 findings
- Jan 7, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction