Staunton Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Staunton, Virginia · CCN 495243
19 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 171
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 170
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE
- County
- Staunton City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 73 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Apr 28, 2026
195 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.28 | 3.34 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.52 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.2% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $24,413 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G48.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3470.8% | E714.6% | F24.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6896×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6072×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Staunton Post Acute & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Mar 19, 2026
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from abuse, including physical and verbal abuse for four of eleven residents in the survey sample, (resident #'s 2, 3, 4, 5) resulting in immediate jeopardy (IJ) and substandard quality of care. After accepting the plan for removal of Immediate Jeopardy from the Administrator, and determining that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, the deficiency was assigned a Scope and Severity level of level 2, pattern. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 17, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide supervision for, one of two residents in the survey sample, Resident #2, that resulted in harm to the resident. The resident left the building at 2:50 a.m. on 7/13/2023 and fell while outside the building. The resident was treated for a lacerations over his left eye and back of left side of head. In the days following the fall it was discovered the resident also had suffered a broken clavicle and a broken femur since the fall of 7/13/2023 with no other falls after 7/13/2023. The findings include: For Resident #2 (R2), the resident eloped out of the facility on 7/13/2023 at 2:50 a.m., with a fall requiring medical attention. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 14, 2023
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was free of an accident hazard for one of 25 residents, resulting in harm at past noncompliance. Resident #210 received a second degree burn from a heating element with a missing heat guard. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for Resident #210 included: Dementia, anemia, brain injury, and seizure disorder. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/28/22. Resident #210 was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 14, 2023
Based on review of facility's records, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a legionella prevention program to protect residents from contracting water-borne pathogens as part of the facility's infection prevention and control program. This failure had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff follow infection prevention practices for hand hygiene during dining observation. This has the potential for facility wide spread of infection and/or contamination. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's policy revised July 2017 and titled Legionella Water Management Program revealed .Facility is committed to the prevention, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including legionella . 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jun 9, 2022
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a registered nurse was onsite at the facility for 8 consecutive hours on 06/05/2022. Findings were: The facility as worked schedule for the week of the survey and the week prior to the survey. On 06/01/2022, 06/03/2022, and 06/05/2022, there was no RN (registered nurse) scheduled. CNA (certified nursing assistant) #1 who did staffing was interviewed on 06/08/2022 at 10:00 a.m. She stated, The MDS (minimum data set) nurses are RNs and they are here for at least 8 hours a day Monday through Friday, so they were here on June 1st and June 3rd .they aren't on the schedule but they are in the building and here if needed .June 5th was a Sunday so there was not an RN here that day. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 171 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 19, 2026Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 31, 2025Complaint7 findings
- Aug 17, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 14, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 9, 2022Standard8 findings
- Jul 13, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Feb 11, 2020Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
- May 9, 2019Complaint30 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 25, 2018Standard12 findings
- Jul 20, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 16, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jun 25, 2015Standard and complaint15 findings
- Sep 3, 2014Standard and complaint1 finding
- Jul 10, 2014Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 26, 2013—15 findings
- Jun 7, 2012—12 findings
- Jun 16, 2011—10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction