Norfolk Health Care Center
Norfolk, Virginia · CCN 495210
18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 105
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 180
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFEWORKS REHAB
- County
- Norfolk City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 73 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Mar 12, 2026
242 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.13 | 3.34 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.44 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 72.8% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $102,245 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3670.6% | E1223.5% | F23.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6222×
Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6252×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6282×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Norfolk Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF725Sep 24, 2025
Based on staff interviews, Facility documentation reviews, and clinical record reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure competent Professional nursing staff oversight, assessment, and administration of tracheostomy care for three residents (Resident #185, #186, and #190) in a survey sample of 60 Residents, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy. After accepting the plan to remove the immediacy from the Administrator and confirming that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, the deficiency was assigned a Scope and Severity level of 3 (G), isolated (harm).The findings included: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Feb 16, 2023
Based on resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to manage pain by adhering to the prescribed medication regimen for two (2) of eight (8) residents (Resident #6 and #7), in the survey sample which resulted in unnecessary severe pain and constituted harm for both residents. The findings include: 1. The facility's staff failed to procure and administer Resident #6's scheduled pain medication Methadone HCL, for chronic pain which resulted in the resident missing multiple consecutive doses and experiencing such severe pain (8.5 to 9.0 out of a pain scale from ,d+[DATE]), which affected her day-to-day activities and ability to sleep. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Jul 15, 2021
Based on general observations of the facility, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Roaches were identified during the survey and recorded sightings by staff on all four floors (three resident units and first floor kitchen and common areas). The findings included: The pest sighting log sheets on all four floors identified roaches. Specifically, a review of the last 6 months on the first floor revealed roaches inside the dietary food cart, baseboard dish room, food tray and activities depart. A review of the last 6 months on the second floor revealed roaches in general areas, room 222, 227, soiled utility room and roaches everywhere in hallway. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Jan 14, 2026
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 3 of 28 residents (Residents #108, #107, and #124) in the survey sample had meals served that followed the menu and meal tickets. The findings included: 1. The facility's staff failed to serve food items according to the menu and meal ticket. Resident #108 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The residents' current diagnoses included stroke, renal failure, and heart failure. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/13/25, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 12 out of a possible 15. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF807Sep 24, 2025
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 3 of 28 residents (Residents #108, #107, and #124) in the survey sample received fluids as listed on the menu, per their preferences, or as ordered. The findings included: 3.The facility staff failed to serve a beverage listed on the menu. Resident #124 was originally admitted to the facility 3/03/17 from an acute care facility and re-admitted on [DATE]. The current diagnoses included; Dysphagia, Mechanically Altered PO Intake and Cerebral Palsy. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/03/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 13 out of a possible 15. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 105 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 12, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jan 14, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Sep 24, 2025Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 16, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 7, 2022Complaint5 findings
- Jul 15, 2021Standard and complaint13 findings
- Jan 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jul 6, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jun 11, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2019Standard and complaint20 findings
- Aug 17, 2017Standard and complaint9 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Standard12 findings
- May 29, 2015Standard12 findings
- Mar 15, 2013—9 findings
- Mar 16, 2012—2 findings
- Feb 4, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction