Southampton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Southampton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF627Feb 6, 2026

  Based on resident representative interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a safe discharge to the community for two of three residents in the survey sample (Residents #1 and #2). Residents #1 and #2 were discharged to a lower level of care in the community without a documented basis for the discharge, a prior discharge plan, identification or verification of needed care/services, involvement of the interdisciplinary team, preparation/orientation for the residents and without involvement or consent from the legal guardian (for Resident #1). This resulted in the identification of immediately jeopardy regarding failure to provide a safe, appropriate discharge to the community.The findings include:1. […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 27, 2024

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure freedom from abuse and neglect for one resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 8 residents. The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was not sexually abused by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-B who was assigned to provide care for the resident's needs, and failed to report an allegation of abuse to the administrator timely. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: quadriplegia, C5-C7 (cervical spine 5-7) incomplete and dysthymic disorder. […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF660Feb 23, 2022

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 2 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) in the survey sample of 3 residents. This resulted in harm for Resident #1. The Findings included: For Resident #1, who was bed-bound, the facility failed to develop and implement a discharge plan for stretcher transportation (non-pharmacological intervention) and failed to administer pain medication. […]

• Actual harm, isolatedF697Feb 23, 2022

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide pain management services for 1 resident (Resident #1) in the survey sample of 3 residents. The Findings included: The facility failed to 1a) administer physician-ordered pain medication. The facility failed to 1b) ensure that stretcher transportation (non-pharmacological intervention) was available transportation upon discharge. This resulted in unbearable positional pain, which constitutes harm. Resident #1's admitting diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Minimum Data Set, with an assessment reference date of 1/31/22, was reviewed. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Sep 3, 2021

  Based on observation, staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to practice and maintain infection control measures to prevent the spread of infections to include Covid-19 while in an active Covid outbreak on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: 1. For the facility in general, 3 employees failed to maintain infection control measures while working in the Resident rooms. Observations on 8/31/21: 830 AM all rooms on the second floor had signs posted on the doors that instructed to use 'Gown Gloves N95 and face shield' in room also there were signs instructing proper donning and doffing and handwashing. […]