Silver Springs Care Center
Meriden, Connecticut · CCN 075337
36 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 140
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 158
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ICARE HEALTH NETWORK
- County
- Lower Ct River Vly
- Medicare-certified since
- 1990
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Apr 30, 2026
193 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.11 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.28 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.8% | 35.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $24,150 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G38.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2672.2% | E38.3% | F12.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B38.3% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6004×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F7563×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Silver Springs Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 31, 2024
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review for two of three residents (Resident #2, Resident #3) review for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from abuse. Residents #2 and #3 had a physical altercation, resulting in both residents with injuries to their faces, and were transferred to the hospital for treatment. The finding includes: 1. a. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the brain, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indictive of an intact cognition and was independent with mobility and had no behaviors. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 12, 2022
Based on clinical record review, observation, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical injury by another resident (Resident #133). The findings include: Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #28 was responsible for self. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #28 was without cognitive impairment and required physical assist of one with ambulation on and off the unit with wheelchair support. The care plan dated 3/31/22 identified Resident #28 had a concern with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and fracture of pelvis and sacrum. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 31, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was covered when prepping food and that a soiled fan facing the food preparation area was not in use when food was being prepared. The findings include: 1. Observation and interview with the Director of Dietary Services on 8/25/26 at 11:30 AM identified that Dietary Aide (DA) #1 was standing at the food preparation area whisking yellow liquid in a large rectangular pan without the benefit of wearing a beard cover. DA # had facial hair on his chin approximately 1/2 inch to 1 inch in length (goatee). The Director of Dietary Services indicated that he was unsure of the length of facial hair that required a beard cover. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Aug 31, 2026
Based on initial tour, observations, record reviews and interviews for the 3 out of 3 nourishment rooms, the facility failed to ensure no items were stored under the sinks, and for the facility environment, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary environment in various common areas noted throughout the building. The findings include: 1. A tour of all 3 nourishment rooms on 8/28/26 at 12:30 PM with the Director of Dietary Services identified that the cabinets under the sink had storage of multiple items and the bottom of the cabinets had dust and small amounts of debris. In the first-floor nourishment room there were several sleeves of unused large Styrofoam cups stored under the sink. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Aug 31, 2026
Based on observations, interviews and facility documentation, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by the presence of multiple gnat/fruit fly type flying insects observed in the kitchen and throughout multiple areas of the facility. The findings include: Observation and interview with the Director of Dietary Services on 8/25/26 at 11:00 AM identified gnats/fruit fly type flying insects were noted to be in food prepping areas, near the 3 bay sinks, and in the dry food storage area. The Director of Dietary stated that he was aware of the flying insect issues and had attempted to treat the drains himself but did not have the proper chemicals. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 140 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 31, 2026Standard and complaint21 findings
- Apr 30, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Dec 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 4, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jun 18, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 3, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Dec 20, 2024Standard6 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Oct 31, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 22, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 12, 2022Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jan 3, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Jun 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jul 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 18, 2018Standard6 findings
- Sep 29, 2017Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- May 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 17, 2016Standard5 findings
- Apr 6, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 9, 2015Complaint5 findings
- Sep 3, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Feb 4, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Sep 2, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 24, 2014Standard8 findings
- Oct 7, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 29, 2013—10 findings
- May 2, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 13, 2012—9 findings
- Aug 27, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 26, 2011—15 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 28, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction