Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at Branford Hills
Branford, Connecticut · CCN 075296
29 surveys since 2010, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 104
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 190
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- South Central Ct
- Medicare-certified since
- 1980
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
May 19, 2026
174 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.75 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.0% | 35.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,021 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3477.3% | E49.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B49.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6863×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at Branford Hills, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 2, 2024
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for wandering, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for a resident with known exit seeking behaviors, to ensure the resident was not able to exit the facility without staff knowledge, and the facility failed to ensure interventions were placed after elopement behaviors were identified. The failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and status post right hip fracture and malnutrition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600May 19, 2026
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, police reports, forensic laboratory findings and interviews for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired, non-verbal resident from sexual abuse by another resident. Resident #3 lacked the cognitive ability to consent to sexual activity and forensic DNA testing confirmed the presence of Resident #2's DNA on Resident #3's oral and genital swabs. The findings include:1. Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included congenital malformation syndrome predominantly affecting facial appearance, dementia, aphasia, intellectual developmental disability, dysphagia, autistic disorder, and speech disturbance. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 25, 2021
Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with bathing, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were in place to prevent a fall from a shower chair that resulted in an injury. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included [CONDITION(S)] and [CONDITION(S)], generalized muscle weakness and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory problems, was alert and oriented, was totally dependent on one (1) person assistance for a shower and bath, had functional limitations in range of motion on one (1) side and had no falls in the past ninety (90) days. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF687Feb 5, 2026
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure podiatry services were provided timely. The findings include: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, onychomycosis (fungal infection of the toenails), and left and right toe pain. A Physician Consult Form dated 1/30/24 and signed by Resident #57 identified he/she agreed for podiatry services contracted by the facility. A podiatry consult form dated 3/20/25 identified Resident #57 had moderately aching, painful toenails in shoes and with pressure and walking which was alleviated by cutting nails out. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 5, 2026
Based on a tour of the Dietary Department, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure stored food was dated when opened, expired food was discarded, and a cleaning chemical was not stored in a refrigerator designated for resident food. The findings included: A tour of the Dietary Department on 1/27/26 at 10:31 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) identified:1. The walk-in freezer was observed to have the following items with open boxes that contained opened plastic bags within the boxes that were undated when they were opened:a. One opened plastic bag of riblets (1/4 full)b. One opened plastic bag of onion rings (1/2 full)c. One opened plastic bag of pork chops (1/2 full)d. One opened plastic bag of hamburger patties (3/4 full)e. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 104 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 19, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 5, 2026Standard15 findings
- Aug 25, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Oct 2, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 24, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Jul 19, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Dec 6, 2022Standard and complaint15 findings
- Jun 21, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Mar 25, 2021Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 31, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 29, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Jun 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 27, 2020Standard1 finding
- Dec 17, 2018Standard2 findings
- Oct 26, 2017Standard4 findings
- Sep 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jun 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 1, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
- Oct 24, 2014Standard3 findings
- Nov 7, 2013Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 10, 2012—7 findings · 3 harm
- Jul 18, 2011—3 findings
- Jun 14, 2011—5 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 7, 2010—3 findings
- May 10, 2010—9 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction