Deficiency Index

Hewitt Health & Rehabilitation Center, Inc

Shelton, Connecticut · CCN 075047

25 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
161
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
206
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
APPLE REHAB
County
Greater Bridgeport
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

Jul 6, 2026

126 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.253.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover40.2%35.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,018 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4570.3%E1117.2%F11.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B69.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 64 of the 161 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6094×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5783×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5803×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Hewitt Health & Rehabilitation Center, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 1, 2024

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls, (Resident #1 and Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure a safety device was utilized for transfers and ambulation in accordance with facility policy resulting in falls with injuries. The findings include: 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses that included dementia and osteoporosis. A physician's order dated 3/7/24 directed an assist of one for transfers with rolling walker. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725May 19, 2025

    Based on interviews and review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions, the facility failed to provide the appropriate number of weekend staff for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 (October 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024). The findings include: PBJ submissions for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 of FY 2024 (October 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024). indicated the facility had triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. An interview with the Scheduler on 5/16/25 at 9:36 AM identified she was not responsible for submitting staffing reports to PBJ and was not aware that the facility had triggered for low weekend staffing for Quarters 1 and 2 of FY 2024. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578May 19, 2025

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 4 of 32 residents (Resident #31, Resident #94, Resident #214 and Resident #315) reviewed for Advance Directives, the facility failed to follow facility policy for completion of resident's choices for advance directives. The findings include: 1. Resident #31's diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, malignant neoplasm of the kidney, and lymphedema. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating, bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 required staff assistance with his/her activities of daily living. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF580May 19, 2025

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #53, Resident #78 and Resident #85) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to notify the resident representative (Resident #1, Resident #53 and Resident #78) and failed to notify the physician (Resident #85) of a weight loss. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, depression, and anemia. Review of the face sheet in the clinical record identified Resident #1 was not responsible for him/herself and a family member was the resident representative. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689May 19, 2025

    Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #6, Resident #98, and Resident #110) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of smoking assessments, to secure smoking materials per the resident plan of care (Resident #6), and failed to provide supervision to a resident smoking (Resident #6) per the smoking assessment. The findings include: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included end stage heart failure, asthma, and acquired absence of the left leg. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 was cognitively intact and was independent with toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 161 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 6, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 19, 2025Standard15 findings
  • Dec 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Sep 25, 2023Complaint7 findings
  • Jun 29, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 24, 2023Standard and complaint22 findings
  • Oct 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2020Standard and complaint11 findings
  • May 24, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 26, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 8, 2019Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 17, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 9, 2017Standard and complaint18 findings
  • Dec 10, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Dec 31, 2014Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jan 21, 2014Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Feb 28, 2013—8 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 2, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 23, 2010—5 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction