Samaritan Keep Nursing Home Inc
Watertown, New York · CCN 335431
22 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 114
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 272
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Jefferson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1975
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.
Last survey on record
Mar 20, 2026
234 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.05 | 3.37 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.28 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $9,113 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J310.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2376.7% | E413.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F8052×
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Samaritan Keep Nursing Home Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Feb 20, 2026
Based on record review and interviews during the survey (Complaint #756448), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one (1) of three (3) residents (Residents #3) reviewed. Specifically, on 03/24/2024 at approximately 12:00 AM, Resident #3 was zip tied (a fastener with a locking, self-snagging nylon strap used to secure items) to the able riser (enabler bar) on their bed by Licensed Practical Nurse #7, for approximately 45 minutes to one (1) hour. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy Past Non-Compliance for Resident #3 and placed all residents at risk for abuse. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 8, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the abbreviated and extended surveys (NY00319112 and NY00294178), the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1, 2, and 3). Specifically, Residents #1, #2, and #3 were reportedly found by staff engaging in sexual activity, indicative of inadequate supervision of these residents with impaired cognition who reside on a secured unit. On three separate occasions, Resident #1 was found to be engaging in sexual acts with 2 other residents (Residents #2 and 3). […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF744Aug 8, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the abbreviated and extended surveys (NY00294178 and NY00319112), the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to attain and or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for residents diagnosed with dementia for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #5 had severe dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), was on thickened liquids and puree diet consistency, wandered on the unit and ingested thin liquids resulting in aspiration pneumonia (inhalation of food/fluids into the lungs). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Mar 20, 2026
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for two (2) of two (2) residents (Residents #184 and #257) reviewed. Specifically, Residents #184 and #257 had their side rails removed and there was no documented evidence they were provided with education, a therapy evaluation, side rail alternatives, or an opportunity to discuss their concerns prior to the side rails being removed. This resulted in a decline in bed mobility for Residents #184 and #257. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Mar 1, 2024
44838 48675 Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 2/26/2024-3/1/2024, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #33, #103, #212, #124, #75, #68, and #92) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #33 did not have pressure relief for their heels as planned and Residents #33, #103, #212, #124, #75, #68, and #92 had air mattresses (a specialty mattress that provides air flow to relieve pressure) in use that were not monitored for functioning. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 114 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 20, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings
- Feb 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 1, 2024Standard and complaint7 findings
- Aug 8, 2023Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 3, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
- Dec 10, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Oct 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Apr 26, 2019Standard3 findings
- Dec 15, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 27, 2017Standard9 findings
- Jul 14, 2016Standard16 findings
- Apr 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 15, 2015Standard11 findings
- Nov 4, 2014Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Apr 4, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
- Nov 12, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 7, 2013—8 findings
- Feb 17, 2012—11 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 1, 2010—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Medford Multicare Center For LivingMedford3 harm findings
- Delhi Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterDelhi1 harm finding
- Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty HStaten Island1 harm finding
- Lilac Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterRochester1 harm finding
- Williamsville Suburban, L L CWilliamsville2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction