Deficiency Index

Royal Megansett Nursing & Rehabilitation

N Falmouth, Massachusetts · CCN 225679

12 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
67
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
ROYAL HEALTH GROUP
County
Barnstable
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

May 20, 2026

173 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.923.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover48.1%39.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1250.0%E1041.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B28.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 67 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5571×

    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Royal Megansett Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF658Nov 9, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On [DATE], Unit Manager #1 discontinued Resident #1's [MEDICATION(S)], without a valid and/or signed physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] On [DATE], Resident #1 exhibited signs and symptoms of a stroke, including slurred speech, left sided facial weakness when smiling, and he/she was unable to hold up his/her left upper extremity. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Nov 9, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . When on [DATE], Unit Manager #1 discontinued Resident #1's [MEDICATION(S)] (an anticoagulant medication), without a valid and signed physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On [DATE], Resident #1 exhibited signs and symptoms of a stroke including slurred speech, left sided facial weakness when smiling, and was unable to hold up his/her left upper extremity. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 7, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was at risk for falls, had severe cognitive impairment, required supervision with ambulation, and assistance of one staff member with toileting, the Facility failed ensure they provided adequate assistance and supervision to maintain a safe environment to prevent accidents and injuries. On 01/23/22, at 7:45 A.M., Resident #1 slipped on the wet floor (newly washed by housekeeping) in his/her room while ambulating barefoot, unsupervised, on his/her way out of the bathroom and fell on to his/her right wrist. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Apr 8, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#56), out of 17 sampled residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a treatment that included an antimicrobial wash to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) on the sacrum (bone located at the base of the spine). Findings include: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of sacral region. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755May 24, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate account of all controlled medications was maintained. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an accurate account of lorazepam (Ativan) (schedule IV-controlled drug with low potential for abuse, treats anxiety) oral concentrate was maintained in the controlled substance accountability record book, as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substances, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility shall comply with all laws, regulations, and other requirements related to the handling, storage, disposal, and documentation of Schedule II and other controlled substances. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 67 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 20, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2025Standard5 findings
  • May 24, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Jan 27, 2023Standard12 findings
  • Feb 7, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 9, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 21, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 30, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Dec 4, 2018Standard18 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 26, 2017Standard8 findings
  • May 19, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Sep 11, 2012—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction