Deficiency Index

Royal Cape Cod Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts · CCN 225538

20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
93
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ROYAL HEALTH GROUP
County
Barnstable
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Jan 20, 2026

293 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.283.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover39.3%39.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$9,004 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG16.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1062.5%E531.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 93 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F7602×

    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6051×

    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Royal Cape Cod Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Apr 1, 2025

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physicians' orders included the administration of Methadone (opioid, narcotic) 10 milligrams (mg) daily, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when on 02/25/25 nursing staff did not properly identify the resident's name or dosage on the medication bottle and administered another residents' methadone to him/her. As a result of Resident #1 being administered 110 mg of Methadone (not 10 mg as ordered), he/she was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and required treatment for adverse side effects related to an overdose of Methadone. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 11, 2021

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards for 3 Residents (#17, #22, and #49), out of a total sample of 17 residents, and for residents on 2 Units (Unit 3 and Unit 4), out of 3 Units. Specifically, the facility 1.) Failed to implement the plan of care for Resident (#17) who required a two person assist for bed positioning, resulting in a fall and the Resident sustaining fractures of the femur (long bone of leg) and tibia (lower leg); and 2.) Failed to secure medications left at the bedside of two Residents (#22, #49); 3.) Failed to secure a medication cart containing many potentially harmful items on 1 Unit (Unit 4- dementia unit), out of 4 Units; and 4.) Failed to lock the clean utility rooms… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Aug 11, 2021

    Based on documentation review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess the resources needed to provide competent support and care for their resident population. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment tool was updated with accurate information to reflect the current licensed beds in service in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Assessment indicated that the facility has a total of 93 licensed beds. The breakdown by unit is as follows and totals 99 beds, and not 93 beds: -19 bed certified Dementia Unit -28 bed Long Term Care Unit -26 bed Short Term/Rehab/Long Term Care Unit -26 bed Secure Long Term Care Unit During an interview on 8/10/21 at 2:51 P.M., the Administrator said that the 19 bed Dementia Special Care Unit (DSCU) was… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF605Jan 20, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for two Residents (#34, #6), from a total sample of 18 residents, that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications to promote or maintain the Residents' highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed for Residents #34 and #6 to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of psychotropic medication was attempted in an effort to discontinue these drugs, unless documented in the medical record by the prescriber as clinically contraindicated. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Jan 20, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#28 and #10), out of a total sample of 18 residents, received care and treatment to pressure areas in accordance with professional standards to promote healing. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #28, to implement treatments as indicated to pressure ulcers on the Resident's left medial buttocks; and 2. For Resident #10, to implement treatments as indicated to a pressure ulcer on the Resident's right medial buttocks.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Management Policy, revised 5/2025, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-Assessments of pressure injuries will be performed by a licensed nurse, and documented in th… […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 93 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 20, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Jul 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 21, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Feb 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 9, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 11, 2021Standard15 findings · 1 harm
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Jun 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Jul 30, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 21, 2019Standard19 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 16, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Mar 13, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 5, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Sep 1, 2015Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 24, 2014Standard1 finding
  • May 24, 2012—2 findings
  • May 2, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction