Deficiency Index

River Edge Rehabilitation and Nursing

Waynesboro, Virginia · CCN 495147

15 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
106
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
109
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EASTERN HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Waynesboro City
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

May 8, 2026

185 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.963.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.54—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%53.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$59,022 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.9%K—L—
Actual harmG12.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2458.5%E1434.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 106 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at River Edge Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600May 8, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to protect two of three residents (Resident (R) 109 and R81) reviewed for abuse from being sexually abused by R15 when the facility allowed the resident to sexually abuse vulnerable residents by not supervising R15, who had a known history of sexual inappropriateness out of 29 sample residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who were at risk for abuse. The facility's Administrator was informed on 05/07/26 at 1:33 PM that Immediate Jeopardy existed which also constituted Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) related to the facility's failure to ensure R109 and R81 were free from sexual abuse by R15 and was determined to exist on 03/15/25. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF607May 8, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention and investigation policies to ensure the safety of two of three residents (Resident (R) 109 and R81) reviewed for abuse out of 29 sample residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who were at risk for abuse. The facility's Administrator was informed on 05/07/26 at 1:33 PM that Immediate Jeopardy existed which also constituted Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) related to the facility's failure to ensure R109 and R81 were free from sexual abuse by R15 and was determined to exist on 03/15/25. The facility provided an Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan that was accepted on 05/07/26 at 5:42 PM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Nov 3, 2022

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure pain management for one of 21 residents in the survey sample, Resident #78. Resident #78 was not administered scheduled pain medication as ordered by the physician; Resident #78 suffered unrelieved pain and was unable to sleep, which resulted in actual harm to the resident. Findings include: Resident #78's diagnoses included, but were not limited: diverticulitis, atrial fibrillation, depression, muscle weakness, dysphagia, abnormal gait, polyneuropathy, history of falls, and musculoskeletal mastoid bone pain. Resident #78's most recent MDS (minimum data set - CMS assessment tool) was an admission assessment dated [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Aug 7, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain the dignity of multiple residents on one of two units during meal distribution. The findings included:The facility staff failed to serve all residents at the table at the same time. The facility staff failed to knock prior to entering resident rooms. The facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision during meals and failed to sit next to residents while assisting with meals. On 8/5/25 at 12:07 p.m., observations were conducted of the lunch meal service on the A-wing. At 12:07 p.m., the first cart of meal trays had just arrived on the unit and Resident #18 (R18) was observed sitting in the tv room with six other residents. R18 was served her meal. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Aug 7, 2025

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive plan of care for four of forty-one residents in the survey sample (Residents #2, #13, #20 and #24).The findings include:1. Resident #2's plan of care was not revised to include the resident's do not resuscitate status, enrollment in hospice services, or that a fall occurred on 7/4/25. Resident #2 (R2) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disorder, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and cognitive communication deficit. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 106 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 8, 2026Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 7, 2025Complaint11 findings
  • Nov 3, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 8, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Dec 2, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • May 23, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Mar 15, 2018Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 11, 2017Standard and complaint10 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Jan 20, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Feb 12, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Jan 15, 2014—4 findings
  • Feb 14, 2013—13 findings
  • Feb 2, 2012—4 findings
  • Apr 20, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2011—9 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction