Deficiency Index

Petersburg Healthcare Center

Petersburg, Virginia · CCN 495144

17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
151
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
COMMUNICARE HEALTH
County
Petersburg City
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Mar 13, 2026

241 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.273.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover57.1%53.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$26,125 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K12.3%L—
Actual harmG12.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3581.4%E511.6%F12.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 43 of the 151 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Petersburg Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Mar 13, 2026

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for four residents in a survey sample of 53 residents (Resident #61- R61, Resident #74-R74, Resident #76-R76, and Resident #77-R77). This non-compliance resulted in R61 sustaining a fracture, R74 having a bloody nose, R76 having scratches, all which required medical interventions, which constituted harm for those three of the four residents. This noncompliance resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) and substandard quality of care which began on 10/29/24 and required immediate facility intervention to protect residents from abuse and neglect. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF660Apr 15, 2022

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and medical record and facility policy reviews the facility failed to provide Resident (R51) with essential discharge planning. This failure impacted R51's psychosocial wellbeing, causing him anxiety at times and desperation to return to his community. This is harm. The facility failed to meet this requirement by failing to: 1. Ensure R51's discharge goals were clearly understood through the use of an interpreter. 2. Develop a discharge plan for R51 to return to his community. 3. Regularly evaluate R51 for his desire to return to his community and assist with resources to make his transition successful. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 11:00 AM, revealed R51 at the Receptionist's window. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 15, 2022

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a water management plan for Legionella with regards to a risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other waterborne bacteria could grow, which has the ability to affect all Residents residing at the facility. The findings included: On 4/14/22, during review of the facility water management program the facility submitted an incomplete and inaccurate facility risk assessment, used to identify where Legionella and other waterborne bacteria could grow and spread in the facility water system. This was reviewed with the facility Administrator and Director of Maintenance, who confirmed the form was not accurate and incomplete. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Mar 25, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to follow the planned menu for 19 prepared meal trays in a survey sample of 19 prepared meals. The findings include: For the lunch meal service provided to residents, the facility staff failed to provide a pear crisp as indicated on the facility's planned menu for 3-24-21. On 3-24-21 at approximately 11:45 pm during meal tray preparation in the kitchen, Surveyor A observed pre-packaged diced pears in single serving cups on the residents' lunch meal trays. The meal tickets on the trays indicated pear crisp. At approximately 4:40 pm, Surveyor A conducted an interview with the Dietary Manager (Employee C) and was asked to describe pear crisp. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Mar 13, 2026

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 resident (#29) in a survey sample of 53 residents.For resident #29 (R29) the facility staff failed to ensure adequate hygiene and grooming assistance for a resident who is dependent on staff for ADL careR29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis and that included but not limited to atrial fibrillation, alcohol, abuse, history of right hemispheric CVA with left upper extremity weakness, low back pain, and alcohol induced dementia. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 151 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 13, 2026Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 15, 2022Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 25, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 17, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Nov 29, 2018Standard13 findings
  • Sep 21, 2017Standard and complaint23 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Sep 1, 2016Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 11, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 8, 2014Standard and complaint9 findings · 3 harm
  • Feb 28, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Nov 14, 2013—9 findings
  • Jan 10, 2013—5 findings
  • Oct 28, 2011—4 findings
  • Jan 4, 2011—3 findings
  • Oct 22, 2010—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction