Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Somerset, New Jersey · CCN 315367
18 surveys since 2013. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 64
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 265
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Somerset
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 10, 2026
122 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.42 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.77 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.6% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1184.6% | E17.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B17.7% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6371×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
- F6411×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6451×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 25, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On [DATE] from 9:53 to10:42 AM, the surveyors, accompanied by the Assistant Administrator (AA) observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the dry storage room on a middle shelf a stack of Styrofoam bowls was removed from their original packaging. The bowls were uncovered, and the eating surface was exposed. On interview the AA stated, I'll take those. That shouldn't be like that. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF836Oct 5, 2021
COMPLAINT # NJ 5, NJ 4, NJ 6, NJ 0 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility provided documentation, the facility failed to a.) maintain the required minimum direct care staff-to-resident ratios as mandated by the state of New Jersey for 33 of 35-day shifts and 29 of 35 overnight shifts reviewed b.) ensure a resident was fed timely for 1 of 13 residents reviewed, (Resident #1) and c.) ensure call bells were answered timely for 3 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #1, Resident #7, and Resident # 10 ) This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) memo, dated 1/28/2021, Compliance with N.J.S.A. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 5, 2021
COMPLAINT # NJ 6 Based on observation, interview, review of the medical records, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the manufacturer's directions for the cleaning and disinfecting of glucometers (blood sugar monitoring device) for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #13, #1, #8, and #9) observed during blood sugar monitoring (fingerstick). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 10/05/21, from 08:32 AM to 08:50 AM, the surveyor observed the medication pass and the Registered Nurse Charge Nurse (RN/CN) as she went from room to room to perform blood sugar checks (fingerstick) of residents on the second-floor unit L2. The surveyor observed the following: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Jul 10, 2026
COMPLAINT #: 2727628 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 7/9/26 and 7/10/26, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) ensure that Resident #1's pressure ulcer was consistently evaluated by wound care and b) develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) that addressed skin conditions identified in Resident #1's comprehensive assessment. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care and was evidenced by the following:Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed medical record review was conducted. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Jul 10, 2026
COMPLAINT #2999892 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 7/9/26 and 7/10/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record in accordance with acceptable professional standards of practice when staff failed to consistently document on the 24 Hour Vital Signs/Neuro Checks form for a resident who had an unwitnessed fall and was observed with redness on their face. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #8) and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: aphasia (a language disorder that affects your ability to… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 64 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 10, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jun 27, 2025Standard6 findings
- Apr 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jan 25, 2022Standard2 findings
- Oct 5, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Dec 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 16, 2020Standard5 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jan 24, 2019Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 20, 2017Standard6 findings
- Oct 6, 2016Standard3 findings
- Aug 16, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Aug 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 10, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 2, 2014Standard5 findings
- Nov 14, 2013—3 findings
- Aug 26, 2013—5 findings
- Mar 28, 2013—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- White House Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterOrangeno harm findings
- Complete Care at West Caldwell LLCWest Caldwellno harm findings
- Complete Care at Green AcresToms Riverno harm findings
- Acclaim Rehabilitation and Nursing CenterJersey Cityno harm findings
- Preferred Care at WallAllenwoodno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction