White House Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Orange, New Jersey · CCN 315372
9 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 24
- Surveys
- 9
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 176
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- COLEV GESTETNER
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 5, 2025
430 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.65 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 22.8% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D872.7% | E218.2% | F19.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at White House Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, putting 147 residents who received meals from the kitchen (12 residents received nutrition via feeding tubes) out of 159 total residents at potential risk for foodborne illness. Specifically, failures included: improper freezer temperatures, a lack of functioning thermometers in the refrigerators/freezers, improper concentration of sanitizer solutions, uncleanable surfaces due to rust, not labeling foods removed from original packaging with the identification of the contents, unclean microwaves in the pantries, improperly maintained equipment such as refrigerators in the nursing pantries, an ice machine was unclean on the inside box where ice was… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Sep 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to allow one out of 33 sampled residents (Resident (R)15) to exercise her right to go to the day room to attend activities. R15 was not allowed to co-mingle with other residents in the activity room after she sustained an infection. R15 was currently on enhanced barrier precautions which did not dictate that the resident could not leave her room and attend activities in the day room or socialize there. This created the potential for R15 to experience isolation and the inability to enjoy previous activities in which she had participated.Findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy policy, dated 06/2025, revealed, . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF711Jun 6, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the physician signed and dated monthly medication orders and b.) ensure the physician or the non-physician practitioner (NPP) performed face-to-face monthly visits. The deficient practice was identified for 19 of 32 residents reviewed (#29, 129, 22, 51, 65, 121, 97, 116, 53, 10, 101, 11, 2, 69, 33, 80, 138, 75, 118) and occurred over a 6 month period. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following. 1. A review of the hybrid medical record for Resident #29 revealed the resident's physician had not hand signed or electronically signed the monthly physician's orders for January, February, March, April, or May 2024. 2. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF553Sep 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident and family member out of 32 sampled residents (Resident (R)103) were invited to the quarterly care plan meeting. The facility's practice did not include inviting residents or families to quarterly care plan meetings. This created the potential for residents/families to lack information regarding care and services provided and lack the opportunity to provide input into care provided.Findings include: Review of the facility's Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team policy, dated 03/2022, revealed, . Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (IDT) . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Sep 5, 2025
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure written notice of the facility's bed hold policy and/or transfer notices that contained all necessary information were provided to three of four residents and/or representatives (Resident (R) 1, R22, and R7) reviewed for transfer notices out of a total sample of 32. This failure had the potential for the resident and/or representative not to have knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, how to appeal the transfer, or to be knowledgeable of the facility's bed hold policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns revealed, . Written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail:b. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 24 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 5, 2025Standard7 findings
- Jun 6, 2024Standard2 findings
- Aug 11, 2022Standard2 findings
- Feb 21, 2020Standard1 finding
- Dec 22, 2017Standard1 finding
- Oct 8, 2014Standard3 findings
- Sep 3, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 5, 2012—4 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
- Jun 9, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction