Raleigh Rehabilitation Center
Raleigh, North Carolina · CCN 345049
30 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 121
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 157
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
- County
- Wake
- Medicare-certified since
- 1972
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Mar 26, 2026
228 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.63 | 3.49 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.33 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 59.7% | 52.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $48,754 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J15.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G210.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1263.2% | E15.3% | F210.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5531×
Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Raleigh Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 18, 2023
Based on record review, staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care safely to a dependent resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #1). On [DATE] Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 began providing care to Resident #1 who was on an alternating air pressure mattress, she left the resident on his right side with the bed at waist height and exited the room to speak with the nurse and obtain supplies. While unattended, Resident #1 fell off the bed onto his back on the floor hitting his head, resulting in a hematoma (a pool of mostly clotted blood that forms in an organ, body tissue or body space) to the back of his head, shoulder pain, and left scalp pain. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 16, 2021
Based on record review, staff interviews and interviews with a physician's assistant, and the hospital physician the facility failed to use 2 persons when transferring a resident with a mechanical lift according to the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #176) reviewed for accidents. The resident slid out of the lift pad onto the floor during the transfer and sustained multiple injuries that resulted in a spleen laceration, subarachnoid hemorrhage and rib fractures. The findings included: Resident #176 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of multiple [CONDITION(S)] and age-related [CONDITION(S)]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 12, 2023
Based on record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to safely transport a resident back to her room via wheelchair (Resident #5) when she requested to be put back to bed. Resident #5's left leg got caught under the left side of her wheelchair without leg rests attached while being pushed by a Nurse Aide (NA) and resulted in a nondisplaced fracture of the left proximal (near the center of the body) tibial (shinbone) metaphysis (neck portion of the long bone) and plateau (cartilage that covers the top end of the tibia). As a result, the resident endured acute (short-term) pain that was treated with medication. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF867Oct 12, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put into place in order to sustain compliance. This included a recited deficiency in the area of Supervision to Prevent Accidents (F689) as evidenced by repeat citations resulting in harm to residents. During the [DATE] recertification and complaint investigation survey, deficient practice at F689 resulted in the resident sustaining a spleen laceration, subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane) and rib fractures. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 22, 2023
Based on observation, record review, and resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Director interviews the facility failed to prevent a fall from bed during incontinence care. Nurse Aide #2 raised the bed to waist level to provide care and Resident #4 rolled off the bed to the floor after being turned on to her side. Resident #4 reported pain in her right thigh and denied hiting her head. Two days after the fall Resident #4 was sent to the hospital for evaluation due to tenderness on the right side of her head and temporary amnesia. A Computed Tomography (CT) of the head (a noninvasive medical exam or procedure that uses specialized X-ray equipment to produce cross-sectional images) was completed and noted a small subdural hematoma (collection of blood outside the brain). […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 121 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 26, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
- Dec 19, 2024Standard3 findings
- Oct 12, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 18, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 22, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 23, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
- Jul 16, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Dec 5, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jun 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 28, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings
- Oct 14, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Complaint5 findings
- Jun 5, 2018Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 1, 2018Standard and complaint9 findings
- Dec 20, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Oct 23, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jun 22, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 16, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
- Oct 24, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 20, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Apr 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2016Standard and complaint9 findings
- May 20, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings
- Oct 16, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Mar 14, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 1, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 14, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 11, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 18, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction