Deficiency Index

PruittHealth-Carolina Point

Durham, North Carolina · CCN 345551

33 surveys since 2011, 21 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
103
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
21
Immediate jeopardy
9
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy9

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file27/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
138
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PRUITTHEALTH
County
Durham
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Feb 11, 2026

271 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover57.8%52.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$52,901 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ211.1%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD950.0%E633.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B15.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 103 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8672×

    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at PruittHealth-Carolina Point, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Mar 13, 2025

    Based on facility video recording, record reviews, and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director and the resident's responsible party (RP), the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired and vulnerable female resident's (Resident #2) right to be free from sexual abuse by a cognitively impaired male resident (Resident #1). On 3/2/25 at 2:50 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) #1 walked past Resident #1 in the hallway. Resident #1 was sitting in his wheelchair with no clothes on and only a towel covering his waist. NA #1 did not intervene and/or redirect the resident. On 3/2/25 at 3:18 AM, Nurse #1 observed Resident #1 on Resident #2's bed. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 18, 2024

    Based on record review and interview of the staff and Police Officer #1, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired dependent resident (Resident #1) from sexual abuse by a cognitively intact resident (Resident #2). On 3/19/24 Resident #2 was found in Resident #1's room by Nursing Assistant #1. Resident #2 was observed fondling Resident #1's penis with skin to skin contact from his hand. Resident #1 was unable to stop the sexual abuse due to his limited ability to move and he was non-verbal/unable to call for help. Resident #1 was incapable of consenting to the sexual act and could not express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person expects to be protected from abuse in their home environment and sexual abuse would cause emotional trauma. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF660Jul 13, 2022

    Based on record review, and interviews with family, home health, and staff, the facility failed to assess a resident's home environment to identify and evaluate barriers at the discharge location and arrange for home health services to commence the day after discharge. Upon arrival home, the transport driver assisted Resident #222 out of the vehicle and onto the sidewalk in front of her residence. The residence had 6 stairs leading to the front door and no wheelchair ramp. The resident's husband was present at the residence. The facility transporter left before the resident ascended the stairs into the residence. Resident #222 was unable to ascend all the stairs due to weakness and her husband was unable to assist her. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 13, 2022

    Based on record review, observation, Police, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mistreatment for 1 of 1 resident investigated for staff to resident abuse (Resident #14). Resident #14 sustained a scratch on her face and nose from the altercation with the staff and was crying stating that the altercation made her feel scared and anxious. Findings included: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Resident #14's care plan (initiated on 7/12/21) was reviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 11, 2026

    F812 -EBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label, date, seal and/or remove expired food items stored for use in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler, the dry goods storage room, and 1 of 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and failed to ensure food service equipment was clean. These practices had the potential to affect food being served to residents. The findings included:a. An initial tour was conducted with the Dietary Manager on 2/8/26 at 10:17 AM. Observations made at the time of the initial tour identified the following concerns in the walk-in cooler:- Two crates of chocolate milk cartons (48) with the expiration date 2/7/26 remained in the refrigerator to be served. One 5-pound plastic bag of partially used shredded cheddar cheese was observed left open to air (not sealed). […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 103 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 11, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Apr 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 17, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Apr 18, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Jul 13, 2022Standard and complaint14 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 29, 2021Standard5 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Feb 12, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 27, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 16, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 12, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Jun 27, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 27, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 23, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Aug 10, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Sep 16, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Mar 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2014Standard and complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Oct 24, 2014Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • May 1, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 7, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2014—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 16, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 19, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 8, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 7, 2012—5 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 2, 2011—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 4, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction