Deficiency Index

Pontiac Nursing Home

Oswego, New York · CCN 335590

24 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
175
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Oswego
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Sep 12, 2025

423 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.093.27
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.35—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%53.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2076.9%E415.4%F13.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 175 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pontiac Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (reference # 532839 [NY00357482]) conducted 9/8/2024 - 9/12/2024, the facility did not ensure food was prepared, distributed, stored, and served in accordance with professional standards for the facility's food services. Specifically, the facility did not ensure prepared foods were cooled properly, stored properly, the food on the steam tables were served at an appropriate temperature during meal service, and nutrition rooms and storage areas were maintained in a clean sanitary condition. Findings included: The facility policy General Sanitation of Kitchen, reviewed 10/8/2024, required defined cleaning tasks, assigned responsibilities, and staff training. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/8/2025-9/12/2025, the facility did not ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence in a manner and an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #52) reviewed and twelve (12) of twelve (12) anonymous residents present during a resident group meeting. Specifically, Resident #52 had intact decision-making ability, and the facility involved the resident's family in financial decisions without asking the resident and informed the resident they could not utilize another cognitively intact resident's cellphone even with permission; and twelve residents present at the resident group meeting voiced concerns they… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/8/2025-9/12/2025, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for four (4) of four (4) residents (Residents #6, #21, #41, and #44) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 did not have a care plan that included the use of bed rails; Resident #21 did not have a current care plan addressing behaviors and diabetes with insulin use; Resident #41's care plan was not reviewed and/or revised after Minimum Data Set assessments; and Resident #44's care plan did not include the use of a urinary catheter (a tube to drain urine from the bladder). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF640Feb 15, 2024

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 2/12/2024-2/15/2024, the facility did not electronically submit encoded, accurate and complete Minimum Data Set assessment data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services System within 14 days after the assessment completion date for 11 of 11 residents (Residents #2, 6, 8, 17, 19, 21, 23, 28, 35, 43, and 50) reviewed for resident assessments. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set assessments for Residents #2, 6, 8, 17, 19, 21, 23, 28, 35, 43, and 50 were not transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services system within 14 days of completion. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Feb 15, 2024

    Based on record review, observation, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 2/12/2024-2/15/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 meals (lunch on 2/13/2024 and breakfast on 2/14/2024) reviewed. Specifically, food was not served at palatable and appetizing temperatures during the lunch meal on 2/13/2024 and the breakfast meal on 2/14/2024. Findings include: The facility policy, Monitoring Food and Liquid Temperatures, reviewed by the facility 9/08/2023, documented the dietary department was to maintain acceptable food temperatures during serving. Temperatures of the food were to be taken and recorded prior to serving. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 175 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 12, 2025Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Feb 15, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Dec 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Apr 22, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2020Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 1, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Apr 19, 2019Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 2, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Mar 7, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 11, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2016Standard19 findings
  • May 24, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 1, 2015Standard and complaint23 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2014Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2014Standard and complaint21 findings
  • Sep 10, 2013—17 findings
  • Feb 12, 2013—16 findings · 6 harm
  • Dec 15, 2011—8 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction