Deficiency Index

Park Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Madisonville, Kentucky · CCN 185012

14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
60
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
71
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS
County
Hopkins · rural
Medicare-certified since
1970

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 64 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Kentucky.

Last survey on record

Jun 5, 2025

522 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.643.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.64—
Annual nurse turnover46.0%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,860 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ212.5%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD956.3%E16.3%F425.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 60 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Grove Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Apr 5, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented for three (3) of eight (8) sampled residents assessed for elopement risk (Residents #13, #40, #52, #53). 1. The facility assessed Resident #13 to be at risk for elopement and was care planned as at risk for elopement and exhibited exit-seeking behavior. However, the resident exited the facility undetected by staff on 03/14/2024 at approximately 4:10 PM and was outside unsupervised for approximately five (5) minutes. 2. Resident #40 stated in interview she had carpal tunnel syndrome in both hands. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 5, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide effective monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement for one (1) of eight (8) sampled residents assessed for elopement risk (Resident #13), out of the total resident sample of twenty-five (25). The facility assessed Resident #13 as at risk for elopement and care planned him/her for the elopement risk, Interventions included utilizing and monitoring a security bracelet for Resident #13 as per protocol. However, on 03/14/2024, facility staff failed to follow the resident's interventions, and allowed Resident #13, whose mobility was per wheelchair, to exit the facility without staffs' knowledge at approximately 4:10 PM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF655Feb 21, 2023

    Based on interview, record review, and the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered baseline care plan within forty-eight (48) hours of admission for one (1) of forty-four (44) sampled residents, (Resident #270). 1. The facility admitted the resident on 05/18/2022 and assessed the resident to be a falls risk upon admission. However, the facility failed to ensure the resident was care planned for falls within the forty-eight (48) hours of admission, as per the facility's policy. Subsequently, on 05/29/2022, the resident was found on the floor in the hallway. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 21, 2023

    Based on interview, record review and policy review it was determined the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices necessary to prevent accidents for one (1) of forty-four (44) sampled residents (Residents #270). The facility assessed the resident as a risk for falls, however, no care plan had been developed and the resident sustained a fall with major injury on 05/29/2022. On 05/18/2022, the facility assessed Resident #270 to be at risk for falls and required the assistance of one (1) staff and a gait belt for transfers and bed mobility. On 05/29/2022 at 10:02 PM, Resident #270 had a fall and was found lying on the floor in the hall. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 26, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The failure had the potential to affect all residents who consumed meals from the kitchen.The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage, dated 08/14/2025, revealed the facility was to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Per policy review, milk was to be rotated with each delivery and the carton with the earliest expiration date to be used first. Continued review revealed all foods were to be covered, dated, and labeled, to ensure the foods were safe to be consumed. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 60 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 26, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jun 5, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 21, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 30, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Sep 16, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 9, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Feb 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Aug 18, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—6 findings
  • Jun 1, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 16, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction