Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
Hampton, New Hampshire · CCN 305055
22 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 103
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 117
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- GENESIS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Rockingham
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 16 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New Hampshire.
Last survey on record
Jan 29, 2026
284 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.15 | 3.35 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.92 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 23.7% | 41.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,521 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J15.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1376.5% | E211.8% | F15.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5651×
Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oceanside Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Feb 9, 2024
Based on record, policy, and interview, the facility failed to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with the American Heart Association guidelines and/or the facility's policy for 1 resident in a survey sample of 11 residents who expired at the facility. (Resident identifier is #1.) Findings include: Review on [DATE] of Resident #1's physician orders revealed an order written on [DATE] for full code, meaning CPR is to be initiated in the event their heart or breathing stops. Registered Nurse (RN) #1 Interview on [DATE] at approximately 11:09 a.m. with RN #1 revealed on [DATE] that he/she was assisting with the care of Resident #1 with Licensed Nurse Assistant (LNA) #1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 29, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement water management control measures for hot water tanks, potentially exposing 104 residents to waterborne pathogens. The facility failed to implement policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 6 residents observed for EBP (Resident identifiers are #12 and #32.), The facility failed to implement Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for TBP (Resident identifiers are #62, #109, and #110). The facility failed to perform hand hygiene and use proper glove use for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident identifier is #12). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Dec 18, 2024
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievances from Resident Council were acted upon (Resident identifiers are #16, #21, and #99). Findings include: Review on 12/16/24 of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 8/19/24, facilitated by Staff E (Regional Activities Director), in the section titled Dietary, revealed: Residents are concerned snacks aren't consistently available when they ask for them. Interview on 12/16/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. with Resident Council (13 residents attended the group meeting) revealed that they had a food committee and no changes ever happen after they voice their concerns about snacks. Interview on 12/18/24 at 8:00 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Jul 2, 2024
Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers had necessary treatment and services, which includes documentation of weekly assessments that contained measurements and descriptions of the pressure ulcer and treatment orders, for pressure ulcers for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident Identifiers are #1 and #2). Findings include: Resident #1 Interview on 7/2/24 at approximately 8:45 a.m. with Resident #1 revealed Resident #1 had wounds to their bottom and their heels. Review on 7/2/24 Resident #1's medical record revealed a clinical admission note dated 6/25/24 that stated: .Skin note: Skin issues noted. Coccyx open area and bilateral back heels black . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Sep 2, 2021
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was free from hazards for 1 of 4 units observed. Observation on 8/31/21 at approximately 9:26 a.m. of the Franceur unit (dementia unit)dining room revealed 2 hot liquid containers on the counter, there was no staff in the area for approximately 6 minutes. Observation on 8/31/21 at approximately 12:20 p.m. of the Franceur unit dining room revealed a drink cart with 2 hot liquid containers with no staff in the area. Resident #9 got up from their table walked over to cart and poured themselves a drink and returned to their seat while staff were out of the area. Interview on 8/31/21 at approximately 1:00 p.m. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 103 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 29, 2026Standard4 findings
- Dec 18, 2024Standard3 findings
- Aug 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 2, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 9, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 29, 2023Standard6 findings
- May 25, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Dec 1, 2022Standard3 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Sep 2, 2021Standard and complaint5 findings
- Dec 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 27, 2020Standard9 findings
- Feb 26, 2019Standard8 findings
- Jan 11, 2019Complaint3 findings
- May 17, 2018Standard5 findings
- May 16, 2018Standard5 findings
- Apr 28, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jan 9, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jan 30, 2014—3 findings
- Dec 15, 2011—3 findings
- Jul 28, 2011—9 findings
- Jan 24, 2011—19 findings · 5 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction