Deficiency Index

Nursing Center at La Posada, The

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida · CCN 106067

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
44
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
40
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
KISCO SENIOR LIVING
County
Palm Beach
Medicare-certified since
2005

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 30, 2024

740 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.413.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.26—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD555.6%E333.3%F111.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 44 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Nursing Center at La Posada, The, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 30, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for potentially 40 of 40 facility residents. The findings included: 1. During the initial observation tour of the main kitchen on 10/27/24 at 9:00 AM and accompanied with the facility's Food Service Director (FSD), the following were observed: (a) Observation of the main hallway leading up to the kitchen entry/exit door noted that the exterior of the air-conditioning vent was covered with a black mold type substance. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF800Oct 30, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a well-balanced diet that meets daily nutritional needs that potentially included 40 of the facility 40 residents, and specifically 6 of 6 sampled residents, Residents #5, #14, #17, #25, 195, and #197, with physician ordered Pureed and Mechanical Soft Diets. The findings included: 1. During the review of Cycle Menu #2 which was being utilized during the survey of 10/27/24, it was noted that the cycle menu documented that the breakfast was the only meal that documented an 8-ounce portion of Choice of Milk. Further review of the lunch and dinner meals noted no milk serving documented and stated only 8-ounce beverage. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847Oct 30, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreements was complied with all the regulatory requirements, that included the Agreement must explicitly grant the resident / representative the right to rescind within 30 days of signing it. This affected 35 residents who had signed the facility's current arbitration agreement for the period of 02/02/21 through 10/24/24. The census at the time of survey was 40 residents. The findings included: On 10/27/24 at 10:58 AM, during entrance conference with the Administrator, she verified that there were residents that have entered into an arbitration agreement. She stated this is done when the residents are admitted and part of their admission packet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF848Oct 30, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreements was complied with all regulatory requirements, that included the arbitration proceedings shall take place in a venue that is convenient for both parties. This affected 35 residents who signed the facility's current arbitration agreement for the period of 02/02/21 through 10/24/24. The census at the time of survey was 40 residents. The findings included: On 10/27/24 at 10:58 AM, during entrance conference with the Administrator, she verified that there were residents that have entered into an arbitration agreement. She stated this is done when they are admitted and is part of their admission packet. She confirmed that no residents at this time have resolved a dispute using arbitration. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF676Oct 30, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care and services, as evidenced by lack of supervision and assistance, during meals for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #17, reviewed for nutrition. The findings included: Review of the clinical record of Resident #17 revealed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Fracture of Left Shoulder, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Repeated falls, and Psychosis. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and the resident required supervision and touching assistance with eating of meals. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 44 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 30, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Sep 8, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jun 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jun 1, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Jun 29, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Sep 1, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Apr 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jul 2, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Apr 25, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Mar 1, 2013—5 findings
  • Dec 1, 2011—2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction