Deficiency Index

Northwest Florida Community Hospital (Snu)

Chipley, Florida · CCN 106055

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
34
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Washington
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 2, 2025

495 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Northwest Florida Community Hospital (Snu), in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Apr 8, 2021

    Based on staff interviews and review of the facility policy, entitled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, the facility failed to self-identify that social distancing of residents and face covering or masks were not implemented. The failures occurred during a COVID-19 pandemic and had the potential to affect 26 of 26 residents that resided on the Skilled Nursing Unit (SNU). The findings include: Cross-reference F880. The facility failed to implement social distancing of six (6) feet or more during dining; and failed to encourage the use of face covering or masks while residents were out of their rooms for six (6) of 14 sampled residents (Residents #s 9, 14, 15, 16, 22, and 175) and four (4) of four (4) unsampled residents (13, 18, 21, and 75). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 8, 2021

    Based on observations, staff interviews, facility record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement social distancing of six (6) feet or more during dining; and failed to encourage the use of face covering or masks while residents were out of their rooms for six (6) of 14 sampled residents (Residents #s 9, 14, 15, 16, 22, and 175) and four (4) of four (4) unsampled residents (13, 18, 21, and 75). The failures occurred during a COVID-19 pandemic and had the potential to affect 26 of 26 residents that resided on the Skilled Nursing Unit (SNU). The findings include: 1. Observation in the dining room of the lunch meal on 04/06/21 at 12:27 p.m., revealed Resident #s 9 and 22 were seated together with only 67 (5.50 feet) between them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF563Jul 8, 2021

    Based on resident, family, and staff interviews and review of the facility's visitor log and visitation policies and procedures, the facility failed to honor residents' right to receive visitors of their choosing at the time of their choosing for 3 of 3 residents sampled for visitation. (Residents #1, #2, and #3) The findings include: On 7/8/21 at approximately 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff Member A, a screener (an individual who verifies the absence of signs or symptoms of COVID-19 for all persons entering the building). She was asked to explain the visitation process for the Skilled Nursing Unit (SNU). When we have someone who wants to see someone in the SNU, we tell them that there is no visitation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Jul 2, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings include:On the initial tour of the kitchen on 6/30/2025 at approximately 11:15 am, an observation was made in the produce refrigerator located in the hospital's kitchen. The General Manager was present for the tour. The following was found on shelves inside: Two pieces of cooked salmon were in a pan covered with plastic wrap with a handwritten label that stated 'Salmon 5/24/25, out 6/2/25'. A pan of cooked rice with a handwritten label dated 6/28/25. Cooked bacon was wrapped in plastic wrap and unlabeled. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Sep 24, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have accurate Advance Directive information on the medical chart for 2 of 4 residents sampled (Resident #19 and #23). The findings include: Resident #19: Resident #19 was observed to have a No Code sticker on the front of the medical chart. However, Resident #19's face sheet listed the resident as a full code dated 8/5/2024. On 5/19/23, the resident had signed a form saying he wished to be DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). On 09/23/24 at 04:50 PM, during an interview with Staff B, a registered nurse (RN), she was asked what No Code means. Staff B stated that the resident has chosen not to be resuscitated. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 2, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2023Standard3 findings
  • May 11, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Dec 15, 2017Standard7 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jan 14, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Oct 2, 2013—3 findings
  • Nov 30, 2012—4 findings
  • Nov 10, 2011—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction