Deficiency Index

Inn at Sarasota Bay Club

Sarasota, Florida · CCN 106035

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
54
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
44
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Sarasota
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 15, 2024

816 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.753.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.99—
Annual nurse turnover42.2%45.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD654.5%E436.4%F19.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 54 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6571×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6841×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Inn at Sarasota Bay Club, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 4, 2023

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning and sanitizing of equipment in the kitchen. The findings included: On 5/1/2023 at 9:15 a.m., during a tour of the kitchen conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following observations were made: Ceiling vents with dust build-up. Photographic evidence obtained. Ice machine with dust build up on vent. Photographic evidence obtained. Stove area and flat cooktop were covered in grease and grime build up. Photographic evidence obtained. There was a container of melted butter sitting on flat cook top that was also covered in grease and grime. Photographic evidence obtained. At the time of the observation, the CDM said the melted butter gets changed before each meal. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Aug 15, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents #21, #25, and #180) of 5 residents reviewed received care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed an admitted [DATE]. The physician's orders dated 7/27/24 included to weigh Resident #21 weekly on Tuesdays starting on 8/1/24 for a diagnosis of malnutrition. The physician's orders dated 7/27/24 also included to obtain the resident's vital signs (Temperature, pulse, respiration, blood pressure) and weight monthly. The clinical record lacked documentation the facility clarified the physician's orders related to the frequency of monitoring the resident's weight. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847Aug 15, 2024

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facilities binding arbitration agreement explicitly informed the residents of their rights to have it explained to them in a manner that was understood, that the agreement could be rescinded within 30 calendar days of signing, that the agreement did not have to be signed or that it was not a condition of admission or continued care in the facility, and that the resident would be allowed to communicate with federal, state or local ombudsman for 3 (Resident #10, #12 and #330) of 13 resident reviewed who had signed the facility binding arbitration agreement. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF848Aug 15, 2024

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreement signed by 3 (Residents #10, #12 and #330) of 13 resident reviewed explicitly informed residents of their rights to select a neutral arbitrator and participate in the select of venue for dispute resolution that both parties agreed upon. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Residents #10, #12, and #330 revealed the residents signed the facility's binding agreement upon admission. On review of Facilities binding arbitration agreement, it did not indicate the following: 1. That the resident has a right to be included in selecting a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700May 4, 2023

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and record review, the facility failed to attempt alternatives prior to the use of bed rails for 4 (Resident #4, #12, #142, and #192) of 6 residents reviewed for bed rails. The findings included: 1. On 5/1/2023 at 10:25 a.m., observation revealed Resident #4 asleep in the bed with bilateral upper bed rails in the up position. On 5/4/2023 at 11:30 a.m., observation revealed Resident #4 sitting up in bedside chair. Both bed rails were in the up position. Record review for Resident #4 revealed no evidence alternatives were attempted prior to use of bed rails on the bed of Resident #4. 2. On 5/4/2023 at 11:40 a.m., observation revealed Resident #12 in her bed sleeping with bilateral upper bed rails in the up position. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 54 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 15, 2024Standard6 findings
  • May 4, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Oct 7, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Nov 15, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Oct 13, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Aug 27, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Sep 18, 2014Standard4 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jul 13, 2012—8 findings
  • Jul 29, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction