Northern Cardinal Rehabilitation and Nursing
Suffolk, Virginia · CCN 495206
18 surveys since 2010, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 115
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- EASTERN HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Suffolk City
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 8, 2025
670 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.20 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.59 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 75.7% | 53.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3373.3% | E1124.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6252×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Northern Cardinal Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Apr 14, 2023
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility accurately reflected the advance directive status for three of 12 sampled residents (Resident (R) 1, R73, and R109) reviewed for advance directives. Advance directive forms were not present for residents who were identified as DNR (do not resuscitate) status. Although physicians signed forms indicating code status, the forms were not signed by the resident or a health care surrogate named in an advance directive form. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Apr 14, 2023
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative, as well as the Ombudsman of transfers and the reason for the move in writing for two (Resident (R) 19 and R69) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization . The facility failed to provide a written notice, containing all required information, including the reason, date, and location to which the resident was transferred, as well as information about appeal rights, when R19 and R69 were transferred to the hospital for emergency care. Findings include: 1.Review of the Progress Note tab in R69's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a progress note dated 09/23/22 and timed 12:23 AM. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Apr 14, 2023
Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to invite 3 residents to attended their person-centered care plan and failed to update and revise one resident care plan who had a change in their code status for 4 of 57 residents (Resident #73, #63, #161 and #109) in the survey sample. PARTICIPATION IN CARE PLANNING 1. a. Review of R73's Admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease with late onset. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Apr 14, 2023
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) 63) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications received their medication in accordance with accepted professional standards. The facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner as ordered on four of four weekends that were reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Medication Administration policy, revised 12/01/22, revealed it is the facility policy to administer medications within 60 minutes prior to or after the scheduled time. On 04/14/23 at 9:30 AM, a telephone interview with R63's family member (FM63) revealed her mother called her about her medications being late on the weekends. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Apr 14, 2023
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that three of 57 sampled residents (Resident (R) 32, R73, and R94) were free of potential accidents while residing in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to verify placement and function of wander guards (device worn to prevent elopements) for the three residents, who had wandering and/or exit-seeking behaviors. This failure placed the resident at risk for elopement and potential injury. In addition, the facility failed to thoroughly assess one resident (R211) after a fall, as well as conduct a thorough investigation with a root cause analysis to determine the reason for the resident's fall so as to initiate steps to prevent further accidents. Findings include: 1. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 115 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 14, 2023Standard and complaint17 findings
- Sep 10, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Nov 17, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Nov 5, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 3, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 19, 2018Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 4, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Mar 9, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2016Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jan 8, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Nov 20, 2015Standard23 findings
- Feb 5, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Nov 20, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jan 10, 2014—2 findings
- Jul 19, 2013—5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 30, 2012—9 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 10, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction