Piney Forest Health and Rehabilitation Center
Danville, Virginia · CCN 495107
14 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 89
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFEWORKS REHAB
- County
- Danville City · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1978
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 77 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Jan 30, 2025
648 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.04 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 63.4% | 53.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2278.6% | E517.9% | F13.6% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6071×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Piney Forest Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 30, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included: The facility staff failed to label and date food items in the facility coolers. On 1/28/25 at 1:28 PM this surveyor and the dining services manager entered the walk-in cooler. This surveyor noted a white storage container on the shelf of the cooler and asked the dining services manager what was in it. The dining services manager pulled the container off the shelf. The bottom of the container had a clear fluid in it. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 30, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to: (a) follow infection control guidelines to decrease the potential of and/or risk for infection transmission for 19 residents experiencing gastroenteritis with nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea; (b) utilize the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for one (1) of 23 sampled residents (Resident #107); and (c) implement infection prevention and control procedures/processes for ESBL (extended-spectrum beta-lactamase) urine infection for one (1) of 23 sampled residents (Resident #93). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to promptly implement contact isolation for 19 residents identified as having gastroenteritis. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Apr 15, 2022
Based on staff interview, family interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide the resident and/or their representatives a summary of the baseline care plans (CP). The facility staff were not providing the resident and/or family's summaries of the resident's baseline care plans. The findings included: 04/12/22 2:29 p.m., during an interview with a family member of Resident #70 the family member expressed a concern to the surveyor that they had not been to a care plan meeting for this resident and that they were told the facility did a weekly report but they had never received one. 04/14/22 1:22 p.m., minimum data set (MDS) nurse stated they did not give baseline CP's to the family and that maybe the nurses on the floor do this. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF800Apr 15, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, and facility document reviews, the staff failed to ensure residents were provided a nutritious diet that took into consideration resident preferences. The findings include: On 4/13/22 at approximately 9:18 a.m., Resident #28 and Resident #69 were observed to be provided their breakfast trays; the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Corporate Nurse were present for these observations. According to the menu and the residents' meal slips, both residents were to receive 4 fluid ounces of sausage gravy. Both Resident #28's and Resident #69's breakfast trays contained less than 4 fluid ounces of sausage gravy. Resident #69's sausage gravy appeared not to contain sausage. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Jan 30, 2025
Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident representative was promptly notified of a change in condition resulting in a transfer to the emergency department for one (1) of 23 sampled residents (Resident #35). The findings include: The facility staff failed to promptly notify Resident #35's resident representative of the need to transfer the resident to the emergency department. Resident #35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/8/25, was signed as completed on 1/13/25. Resident #35 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 89 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 30, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jun 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 15, 2022Standard and complaint16 findings
- Feb 7, 2019Standard6 findings
- Oct 5, 2017Standard11 findings
- Sep 22, 2016Standard5 findings
- Oct 15, 2015Standard5 findings
- Dec 10, 2014Standard5 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Dec 4, 2013—2 findings
- May 29, 2013—6 findings
- Nov 16, 2012—5 findings
- Jan 5, 2012—4 findings
- Sep 2, 2011—13 findings
- Nov 4, 2010—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Oak Grove Health & Rehab Center, LLCChesapeake1 harm finding
- Autumn Care of ChesapeakeChesapeakeno harm findings
- Chase City Health And Rehab CenterChase City1 harm finding
- Waverly Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWaverlyno harm findings
- Northern Cardinal Rehabilitation and NursingSuffolkno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction