Every finding on record at Northampton Post Acute

Based on facility policy review, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff on one of three nursing units. (Unit 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Oxygen Storage, last reviewed on January 16, 2026, revealed that oxygen cylinders were to be stored in racks with chains, sturdy portable carts, or approved stands, were never to be left free-standing, and were not to be stored in any resident room or living area. Observations in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on May 7, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., 10:30 a.m., and 1:05 p.m., revealed an unsecured oxygen tank standing in the corner of the room. Observations on May 5, 2026, between 1:55 p.m. and 2:10 p.m. and May 6, 2026, between 9:30 a.m. and 10:05 a.m. revealed the following: In the shower room on unit one, there were broken tiles on the walls of two shower stalls. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, an oxygen concentrator had dust and black hair on the top front cover, the concentrator filter was coated with a white substance, and the wallpaper behind the concentrator was torn. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the floor had a sticky substance with dust, paper and food debris. In an interview on May 7, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the identified environmental issues should have been addressed. In an interview on May 7, 2026, at 2:45 p.m., the NHA confirmed that the oxygen tank should not have been stored in the resident's room. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e )(2.1) Management.

Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to meet a resident's medical and physical needs for one of 35 sampled residents. (Residents 18)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of falls. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident 18 required substantial to maximal assistance from staff for upper body dressing and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Review of Resident 18's care plan revealed he had skin breakdown related to impaired mobility, was at risk for spills and burns from hot liquids, and was dependent on staff for dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. The care plan goal was to reduce the risk for skin breakdown with interventions that included for staff to apply Geri-Sleeves (cotton-blend Lycra arm sleeves that provide skin protection) with morning care and to remove them at bedtime. Observations on May 7, 2026, at 11:50 a.m. and 1:51 p.m., and May 8, 2026, at 11:35 a.m., revealed Resident 18 was wearing short-sleeved shirts without the Geri-Sleeves. There was no documentation that the resident refused wearing the Geri-Sleeves. During an interview on May 7, 2026, at 2:10 p.m., the nurse unit manager, RN 2, confirmed that Resident 18 should have had the Geri-Sleeves applied. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow procedures to prevent accident hazards for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 162)Findings include: Review of the facility policy on Sharps Disposal, dated January 16, 2026, revealed that contaminated sharps will be discarded immediately and into closable, puncture resistant containers. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 162 had diagnoses that included cognitive communication deficit, acute embolism (when a blood clot travels and settles in another location) and thrombosis of unspecified vein (the formation of a blood clot in blood vessels, partially or completely blocking blood flow), anemia (a deficiency of healthy red blood cells), hypokalemia (low potassium levels, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. A Social Services assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 162 had impaired cognition. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 162 was receiving an anticoagulant medication (a medication to prevent blood clots). Observation on May 5, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., revealed an uncapped disposable razor on the bedside table. Observation on May 5, 2026, at 12:50 p.m., revealed the razor in the waste basket beside the resident's bed. At 12:55 p.m., the unit manager, Registered Nurse 1, stated that it was not disposed of properly. In an interview on May 5, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility policy was not followed and the razor should have been disposed of in a puncture resistant container. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) for one of two nursing units observed during medication administration. (Unit 1)Findings include: Observations of medication administration on May 6, 2026, from 8:05 a.m. to 8:20 a.m., revealed 27 medication opportunities with two medication errors that resulted in a medication administration error rate of 7.41%. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 53 had diagnoses that included heart disease, high blood pressure, and thrombosis in a deep vein of the lower extremity (the formation of a dangerous blood clot in a vein of the leg). A review of the physician's orders dated December 24, 2025, revealed that staff was to administer an enteric coated (a polymer barrier coating on an oral tablet or capsule that prevents it from dissolving in the stomach's acidic environment) medication used to prevent blood clot formation (aspirin) and a combination medication used to treat constipation (senna-docusate sodium oral tablet 8.6 milligrams (mg)-50 mg). Observation revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 1 administered a chewable aspirin (a form that did not have an enteric coating) and a senna 8.6 mg tablet, which should have been senna 8.6 mg-docusate sodium 50 mg tablet. In an interview on May 7, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the two medication administration errors occurred. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served in a manner that maintained each resident's dignity for one of 34 sampled residents. (Resident 138) Findings include: Observations of the lunch meal on the 2nd floor nursing unit on April 23, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., revealed Residents 32, 96, 99, 102, 138, and 143 were seated in the dining room. At 12:32 p.m., Residents 32, 96, 99, 102, and 143 were served and were eating their meals. Resident 138 was observed without a meal, throwing his hands in the air, and making comments including, What do you have to do to get food around here? Resident 138 was not served his lunch tray until 12:55 p.m. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 9:18 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that all residents in the dining room should be served a meal at the same time. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights.

Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was accessible for one of 34 sampled residents. (Resident 471) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 471 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of a recent stroke. A nursing note from the date of admission indicated that Resident 471 was alert, oriented, was able to make his needs known, had very little control of his left leg, and had no control of his left arm. Review of the care plan indicated Resident 471 was at risk for falls related to an acute stroke. There was an intervention for staff to be sure the call bell was within reach and provide reminders to use the call bell for assistance. On April 22, 2025, at 12:15 p.m., April 23, 2025, at 8:50 a.m. and 12:10 p.m., the resident was observed sleeping in his bed. The call bell was on the nightstand to the right side of the bed and was out of the resident's reach. On Thursday, April 24, 2025, at 10:45 a.m., the call bell was on the floor on the right side of the bed and the resident was sleeping. Later that same day, at 2:30 p.m., the call bell was on floor on the right side of the bed, and the resident was awake and talking with a visitor. In an interview on April 24, 2025, at 2:31 p.m., Resident 471 stated he could not find the call bell, that he could not use it because it kept falling off of the bed, and that he was relying on his roommate to ring for him whenever he needed help. In an interview on April 24, 2025, at 2:35 p.m., the Unit Manager stated the call bell should be clipped to the Resident's bed at all times. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 9:28 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the call bell should have been accessible and clipped to the bed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed to accurately reflect the resident's current status for one of 34 sampled residents. (Resident 147) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 147 had diagnoses that included non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space around the brain), torticollis (a condition in which the muscles of the neck contract causing the head to twist and tilt to one side), and left hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body). Review of the occupational therapy evaluation dated December 19, 2024, revealed that the resident had impairments with strength and range of motion in the left upper extremity. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], did not identify the resident as having an upper extremity impairment in functional limitation in range of motion on one side under section GG, Functional Status. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 9:37 a.m., the Administrator stated that the assessment did not identify the upper extremity impairment and that the MDS was not coded to accurately reflect the resident's current status.

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for one of 34 sampled residents. (Residents 19) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 19 had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and heart failure. A physician's order dated April 15, 2025, directed staff to administer a medication (midodrine) three times a day for hypotension (low blood pressure). Staff was not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was greater than 130 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of Resident 9's medication administration record revealed that staff administered the medication on April 16, 18, and 21, 2025, when the resident's SBP was greater than 130 mm/Hg. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 10:05 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication was documented as administered outside of the established parameters for Resident 19. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline and/or improve range of motion for one of nine sampled residents with limited range of motion. (Resident 147) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 147 had diagnoses that included non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space around the brain), torticollis (a condition in which the muscles of the neck contract causing the head to twist and tilt to one side), and left hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and dressing. Review of the occupational therapy evaluation dated December 19, 2024, indicated that the resident had no functional limitations present due to contracture. Review of the occupational therapy discharge summary from January 27, 2025, revealed no discharge recommendations or restorative nursing program. The occupational therapy evaluation dated March 25, 2025, indicated that the resident had a functional limitation present due to contracture. Observations on April 22, 2025, at 11:31 a.m., April 23, 2025, at 9:15 a.m., and April 24, 2025, at 12:40 p.m., revealed that the resident was in a reclining chair with her left hand and wrist slightly contracted. In an interview at that time, the resident stated that her hand had gotten worse and she had difficulty moving her hand. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 11:06 a.m., Occupational Therapist 1 confirmed that the resident had a decline in range of motion in the left upper extremity since the last assessment with no interventions put in place. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate catheter care was provided for one of three sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. (Resident 106) Findings included: Review of the facility policy entitled, Catheter Care, Urinary, last reviewed November 1, 2024, revealed that a urinary drainage bag was to be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 106 had diagnoses that included urinary obstruction and enlarged prostate. On April 2, 2025, the physician ordered for the resident to have a foley catheter every shift. The care plan directed staff to keep the catheter below the level of the bladder. On April 22, 2024, from 12:45 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., Resident 106 was observed sitting in his recliner in the dining room and then across from the nurses' station with the catheter drainage bag hanging on the armrest of his recliner chair, which was above the level of his bladder. Urine was observed in the catheter tubing that hung over the arm rest. On April 23, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. to 10:15 a.m., Resident 106 was observed sitting in a recliner chair at the nurses' station with the catheter drainage bag hanging on the armrest of the recliner chair, which was above the level of the resident's bladder. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 9:33 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the catheter drainage bag should have been maintained below the bladder at all times. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (delivery of nutrition by a feeding tube) in accordance with the physician's order for one of two sampled residents receiving nutrition by a feeding tube. (Resident 58) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 58 had diagnoses that included history of a brain injury, a seizure disorder, and was a quadriplegic. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and was unable to express needs or understand others. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed that the resident received more than 51 percent of nutrition through an enteral feeding tube. A physician's order dated May 28, 2024, directed staff to administer Jevity 1.2 (a tube feeding formula) at a rate of 55 milliliters (ml) per hour starting at 8:00 p.m., and to continue until a total volume of 935 ml was infused. On April 24, 2025, at 10:19 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. A bottle of tube feed formula was on the pole and its label indicated it was started on April 23, 2025, at 9:35 p.m. The tube feeding was not connected to the resident and the tube feeding pump was turned off. Only 300 ml was infused when observed. In an interview on April 24, 2025, at 10:25 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse 1 (LPN 1), stated that the tube feed was typically started on night shift as ordered and was infused until 1:00 p.m. LPN 1 had not disconnected the tube feed during her shift which had begun that day at 7:00 a.m. In an interview on April 25, 2025, at 9:40 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the tube feeding had been stopped for care and had not been resumed as ordered. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on facility policy review, resident interviews, observation, and results of a test tray evaluation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature on one of three nursing units. (Second floor) Findings include: Review of the facility's Policy Manual Chapter 3: Food Production and Food Safety, dated November 1, 2024, revealed that fish, poultry, meat, pork and unpasteurized shell eggs should be cooked to a minimum temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for a minimum of 15 seconds and served at a temperature between 145 and 165 degrees F. In interviews on April 22, 2025 at 09:50 a.m. through 11:00 a.m., Residents 29, 70 116, and 117 stated that food was often served undercooked and cold. A test tray conducted on April 22, 2025, at 1:21 p.m., on the Second floor nursing unit after the last resident meal tray was served from the dining cart, revealed the baked breaded fish was 140 degrees F. The center of the fillet was liquid, cold to touch, and unpalatable. In an interview on April 22, 2025, at 1:21 p.m., the Dietary Manager confirmed the item did not meet the policy guidelines for the preparation and serving of hot foods. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the tray line service on May 29, 2024, at 11:22 a.m., revealed the following: There was uncooked beef on the floor and shelf under a food preparation table. There were clean cutting boards, and bins of food product that included flour and powdered mashed potatoes on that shelf. Dietary Employee 2 (DE 2) was observed preparing resident meal trays. DE 2 proceeded to turn away from the tray line and obtained food items from the oven on multiple occasions. DE 2 then returned to the tray line and continued handling resident plates and ready to eat food items, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. CFR 483.60 Food Procurement Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary. Previously cited 7/18/23. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess a significant weight change for one of seven sampled residents at risk for weight loss. (Resident 100) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Nutritional Assessment, last reviewed January 1, 2024, revealed that staff would conduct a nutritional assessment as indicated by a change in condition that placed the resident as risk for impaired nutrition. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 100 had diagnoses that included dementia and depression. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for a nutritional problem. On September 12, 2023, the resident weighed 142.4 pounds (lbs.). On October 6, 2023, the resident weighed 129.6 lbs., which reflected a significant weight loss of 8.9 percent in less than 30 days. On October 9, 2023, the resident weighed 129.4 lbs., which confirmed the weight loss. There was no evidence that the dietitian assessed the resident until February 16, 2024. In an interview on May 30, 2024, at 3:17 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the resident was not assessed by the dietitian prior to February 16, 2024. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.

Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three residents receiving dialysis. (Resident 125) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Nursing Home Dialysis Transfer Agreement, last reviewed January 1, 2024, revealed that the facility would ensure that appropriate medical, social, administrative, and other information would have accompanied all designated residents at the time of the transfer to the dialysis center. The information was to include appropriate medical records that included history of illness, treatment that was presently being provided to the resident (including medications), any changes in condition, medication, diet, or fluid intake. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 125 had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease that required hemodialysis and anemia. Review of the resident's dialysis communication forms revealed that section one of the form, which was to be completed prior to transfer and included medications, vital signs, and status of the shunt site (point of access for dialysis), was not completed on April 2, 4, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, and 30, 2024, and May 14, 16, 21, 23, 25, 28, and 30, 2024. In an interview on May 30, 2024, at 3:17 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the communication forms should have been completed prior to the resident's transfer to dialysis on the identified dates. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the dietary department. Findings include: During an environmental tour on July 16, 2023, at 9:56 a.m., of the dietary department revealed the following observations: In the main cooking area, the upper and lower convection ovens were soiled with grease and a black substance on the inside, on the bottom of the ovens, and there was a build up of grease on the inside of the doors. Observation of the stove top oven had a steel backsplash that was stained with a black substance behind the burners. Observation of the steel wall behind the convection ovens and the stove top oven was splattered with food substances and was soiled in the main cooking area. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3) Management. 28 Pa. Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one resident with a diagnosis of PTSD. (Resident 140) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included PTSD and anxiety. Review of the social service admission assessment dated [DATE], and the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and had a diagnosis of PTSD. There was no documented evidence that the resident had been assessed for past trauma and/or that interventions had been developed to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. In an interview on July 17, 2023, at 9:05 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no assessment completed or care plan developed to address Resident 140's PTSD symptoms or triggers. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(3)(5) Nursing services. 28 Pa. Code 211.11(e) Resident care plan.

Based on review of food committee minutes, review of weekly menus, resident and responsible party interviews and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accomodate each resident's food preferences for six of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 4, 69, 71, 121, 142, 165) Findings include: Review of the monthly food committee minutes revealed that in April 2023, the residents had a concern that items were missing from their food trays. In May 2023, the residents had a concern that they were not getting condiments on the trays with their meals. In June and July 2023, the residents had a concern that they were not getting the items that they had selected from their menus on the trays. Review of the menu for this week, (listed as the Week 3 regular menu), revealed that a juice of the day was listed to be offered at lunch time every day of the week. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included vitamin D deficiency, anemia, and anxiety. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was alert and oriented. In an interview on July 17, 2023, at 8:34 a.m., Resident 4 stated he wanted juice with his meals but that he did not receive it. Review of Resident 4's meal ticket revealed he was to receive a juice of choice. No juice was observed on Resident 4's meal tray. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 69 had diagnoses that included anemia and hypercalcemia (low calcium). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and required set up help for eating. In an interview on July 16, 2023, at 11:18 a.m., the resident stated that he selected his menu, but did not always receive the items that he had selected. Observations on July 17, 2023, at 12:43 p.m., revealed that staff delivered his lunch to him in his room. Review of the tray card revealed that he had selected a roll with butter. Observation and an interview with the resident at this time, confirmed that he did not receive the roll with butter on his lunch tray. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 71 had diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and required set up help for eating. In an interview on July 16, 2023, at 11:17 a.m., the resident stated that she selected her menu but did not always receive the items that she had selected. Observation on July 16, 2023, at 12:18 p.m., revealed that staff delivered lunch to the resident in her room. Review of the tray card revealed that she had selected a roll with butter. She received a slice of regular bread with no butter. Further observation revealed that she had received a tea bag but did not receive a mug of hot water for the tea. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 121 had diagnoses that included dementia and adult failure to thrive. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had memory impairment and required set up help for eating. In an interview on July 16, 2023, at 12:21 p.m., the resident's responsible party stated that she did not always get the food items that were listed on her tray card served on her meal trays. Observation on July 16, 2023, at 12:21 p.m., revealed that staff deliverd her lunch to her room. Review of the tray card revealed that she was to receive the juice of the day for lunch. Observation of the lunch tray revealed that she had not received any kind of juice. Observation on July 17, 2023, at 12:25 p.m., revealed that staff had delivered her lunch to her room and again revealed that she had not received any kind of juice on her tray. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 142 had diagnoses that included diabetes. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and required set up help for eating. Observation on July 17, 2023, at 12:30 p.m., revealed that staff delivered his lunch to his room. Review of the tray card revealed that he had selected an alternate meal that consisted of potato salad and a ham and cheese sandwich. He had received a turkey and cheese sandwich with no potato salad. At this time, the resident stated, I asked for ham not turkey and I didn't get my potato salad. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included femur fracture, muscle wasting, and deficiency of other specified group B vitamins. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was alert and oriented. In an interview on July 17, 2023, at 8:36 a.m., Resident 165 stated he wanted salt and pepper with his meal and sugar for his coffee. No salt, pepper or sugar were observed on Resident 165's meal tray.

Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained on two of three nursing units. (100 and 200 nursing units) Findings include: Observations on July 19, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., and July 20, 2022, at 2:00 p.m., on the 100 nursing unit, revealed that the tube feeding pole and surrounding floor in room 133-B was heavily soiled with a dried light brown substance. Dresser drawer handles were broken in rooms 133-B, 127-A, and 127-B. Observations on July 19, 2022, at 1:16 p.m., and July 20, 2022, at 12:21 p.m., on the 100 nursing unit, revealed that the tube feeding pole and surrounding floor in room 111-A was heavily soiled with a dried light brown substance. Observations on July 19, 2022, at 1:36 p.m., and again on July 20, 2022, at 12:04 p.m., on the 100 nursing unit, revealed that the clock on the wall was stopped at 1:15 p.m., in room 121-B. The second hand was not moving and the clock had the wrong time. Observations on July 19, 2022, from 9:50 a.m., and July 20, 2022, at 2:30 p.m., on the 200 nursing unit revealed that the privacy curtain between the A and B bed in room 226 had large orange stains. There was a brown stain on the ceiling over bed 227-A. In rooms 226-B and 234 the dresser drawers had holes where there had once been locks. Observation on July 19, 2022, at 12:20 p.m., revealed that in room 209-B, the resident's bottom dresser drawer handle was missing a screw and the top of the dresser had a flattened cardboard box draped over it with the television placed on it. The television was cracked on the left bottom corner with tape over it. On July 20, 2022, at 12:20 p.m., the bottom dresser drawer handle was still missing a screw. 28 Pa.Code 207.2(a) Administrator's responsibility.

Based on clinical record review, observation, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was accessible for six residents on one of three (200 unit) nursing units. (Residents 8, 52, 102, 105, 116, 134). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 8's current care plan revealed that he was at risk for falls with interventions to reinforce the need to call for assistance and a call don't fall sign to be hung in his room. On July 19, 2022, from 10:00 a.m. until 11:05 a.m., the Resident was observed in his wheelchair on the door side of his bed, with his call bell under the blankets of his bed, out of reach. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 52's current care plan revealed that she was at risk for falls with interventions to reinforce the need to call for assistance and a call don't fall sign to be hung in her room. On July 19, 2022, at 9:58 a.m., the resident was observed in her bed, with her call bell clipped to her lamp's shade on the dresser next to her bed. In an interview at that time, Resident 52 stated she could not reach back there. On July 19, 2022, at 12:01 p.m., the resident was observed in bed with her lunch tray, the call bell remained clipped to the lamp's shade, out of reach. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 102 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 102's current care plan revealed that she was at risk for falls with an intervention to have commonly used items within reach. On July 19, 2022, from 10:25 a.m. until 12:03 p.m., the Resident was observed in her wheelchair on the window side of her bed, with her call bell draped over her bed towards the door side of her room, out of reach. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 105's current care plan revealed that she was at risk for falls with interventions to reinforce the need to call for assistance. On July 19, 2022, at 10:09 a.m., the Resident was observed in her wheelchair on the door side of her bed, with her call bell draped over the bedside dresser on the window side of her bed, out of reach. On July 19, 2022, at 12:02 p.m., the Resident was observed in wheelchair with her lunch tray, the call bell remained draped over the bedside dresser, out of reach. On July 20, 2022, at 9:01 a.m., Resident 105 was observed in bed, with her call bell draped over the bedside dresser, out of reach. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 116 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairments and required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 116's current care plan revealed that she was at risk for falls with an intervention to reinforce the need to call for assistance. On July 19, 2022, at 10:28 a.m., the Resident was observed in her bed, with her call bell on the floor to the left side of her bed. On July 19, 2022, at 12:00 p.m., the Resident was observed in bed with her lunch tray, the call bell remained on the floor to the left of her bed, out of reach. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 134 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 134's current care plan revealed that she was at risk for falls with an intervention to reinforce the need to call for assistance. On July 19, 2022, from 9:52 a.m. through 12:05 p.m., the Resident was observed in her be with her call coiled on the floor under her bed, out of reach. In an interview on July 21, 2022, at 9:10 a.m., the Administrator confirmed the residents' call bells should have been within reach. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of select facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent resident neglect that resulted in a serious injury and actual harm of a right hand sutured fourth finger that required transfer to hospital for medical intervention for one of 33 sampled residents. This deficiency is cited as past noncompliance. (Resident 206) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Patient Protection Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment & Misappropriation Prevention, dated November 1, 2019, revealed that staff were to provide resident care necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, and mental anguish. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 206 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated December 5, 2019, reflected that the resident was cognitively impaired, required the extensive assistance of staff for activities of daily living, and was at risk for skin injury. Review of documentation submitted by the facility revealed that on January 6, 2020, at 10:45 p.m., LPN1, a Licensed Practical Nurse, performed a dressing change to the Resident 206's right sutured finger. LPN1 noted drainage, blood noted with puss secreted from the sutured site, and then applied a sterile wound dressing treatment, without notifying the physician or supervisor of his findings (the resident had signs/symptoms of infection and a change in condition.) In addition to not notifying the physician or supervisor, LPN1 also documented swelling noted around middle and wring finger. On January 8, 2020, (two days later) at 3:15 p.m., documentation revealed that Resident 206 had been seen by an orthopedic specialist and the findings indicated a swollen, red, infected right ring finger with sutures present and tender on involvement. The findings concluded with exfoliation (come apart or to be shred from the surface) of epidermis (skin) right ring finger. The orthopedic specialist then recommended that the right infected finger be debrided (removal of the damaged tissue from the wound) today, and Resident 206 was to be sent directly to the hospital emergency department for treatment and emergency surgery. Review of information dated January 31, 2020, submitted by the facility following a telephone interview with LPN1 on January 18, 2020, at 3:00 p.m, revealed LPN1 admitted that Resident 206's finger was more swollen when he changed the dressing, and the blood looked old, dry. In a second interview on January 23, 2020, LPN1 described the resident's sutured ring finger as swollen, dried blood at the tips, and drainage at the site after changing the dressing. Review of the facility policy entitled Skin Practice Guide, dated November 1, 2019, revealed that when staff identify a change in condition, such as a deterioration in or the development of new risk factors or skin alterations, the licensed nurse was to notify the physician, administration, and the legal representative and document the findings in the clinical record. Nursing documentation revealed that LPN1 performed wound care to compromised skin integrity without physician orders and without the required communication as outlined in the facility policy. Review of information submitted by the facility as complete on January 31, 2020, reflected that the facility had substantiated the allegation of neglect of Resident 206 by LPN1. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. Information submitted by the facility to the Department included the following corrective actions in response to abuse and neglect by LPN1 to Resident 206. The facility implementation of the plan started January 23, 2020 and is ongoing. Documentation reviewed (audits, in-service record, staff interviews) revealed that the plan was being monitored for implementation by the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator. A. All licensed nursing staff assigned to unit where LPN1 was located were interviewed by the facility to determine any additional individuals who may have been involved or have had knowledge of the incident. B. All facility employees were reeducated regarding resident rights, confidentiality, and privacy. New employees receive education prior to beginning job assignments. C. As of February 4, 2020, all licensed nursing staff had been educated on the skin practice guidelines and new licensed nursing staff are not permitted to work until they receive the education. D. Nursing unit managers and the Director of Nursing/designee are required to monitor skin practice compliance and reported weekly to the Administrator/designee. E. Personnel files reviewed revealed that criminal background checks were completed prior to hiring employees. Personnel files reviewed revealed all staff were properly trained on abuse and neglect prevention. Staff interviews completed on February 5, 2020, during the 7-3 shift revealed 23 of 23 employees were aware of all the facility abuse and neglect reporting requirements. The Personnel file for LPN1 included the required background checks prior to employment and reference checks and there were no disciplinary actions involving this employee. F. The facility has terminated the employment of LPN1 and notified the Licensure Board. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.29(a) Resident rights. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided sufficient safety and supervision to prevent a fall that resulted in serious physical injury for one of four residents who fell (Resident R145). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident R145 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a history of falls. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated August 2, 2016, indicated that the resident's [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The assessment also reflected that the resident had impaired memory and required staff assistance with dressing, transferring, and walking. An occupational therapy evaluation dated July 27, 2016, reflected that the resident was at risk for falls. A review of the care plan (a document that lists the resident's care needs and the measures that the staff were to implement to meet those needs) dated July 27, 2016, revealed that the resident was at risk for falls, and that one of the reasons she was at risk for falls was due to, impaired balance/poor coordination. Nurses' notes on August 29, 2016, at 7:35 AM reflected that the resident had been found on the floor after a nurse aide called for help, and that the resident was transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. Nurses' notes at 12:30 PM that day reflected that the hospital reported that the resident was found to have a fractured hip. The facility initially submitted documentation regarding this fall to the Department on August 31, 2016. Review of that documentation revealed that on August 29, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Employee 1, a Nurse Aide, was helping the resident to dress. Employee 1 had assisted the resident to sit on the side of the bed and had placed the resident's bra and blouse on the bed beside the resident. When Employee 1 reached for the resident's bra, the resident fell off the bed. In an interview on September 8, 2016, at 12 PM, the Director of Nursing reported the following: that when the accused reached for the resident's bra, she saw that the hook and eye closures were bent; that the accused tried to bend these back into place so that they would lay flat and not press into the resident's skin; and that while the accused was doing this, the resident fell off the bed. Documentation by the hospital physician dated August 30, 2016, at 7:11 AM revealed that the resident was found to have a left femoral neck fracture (a break in the left thigh bone near the hip). Hospital documentation reflected that the resident required surgery to repair the fracture. CFR 483.25 Quality of Care Previously cited 10/19/15 28 PA Code 211.10(d) Resident care policies. Previously cited 2/19/16 28 PA Code 211.12 (d)(5) Nursing services Previously cited 2/19/16, 1/11/16, 10/19/15, 3/13/15