Deficiency Index

Murphy Rehabilitation & Nursing

Murphy, North Carolina · CCN 345190

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
38
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
134
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Cherokee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 19, 2024

690 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.403.49
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover37.0%52.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD758.3%E433.3%F18.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 38 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Murphy Rehabilitation & Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 19, 2024

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination by storing a plastic scoop inside the dry flour ingredient bin allowing the handle to touch the dry flour for 1 of 1 observation. The facility also failed to ensure staff had their hair restrained in the kitchen while bagging utensils for 1 of 1 staff observed bagging utensils and failed to ensure staff changed gloves before touching resident foods for 2 of 3 staff observed preparing food. These practices had the potential to affect food served to all the residents. Findings included: a. During an observation of the kitchen on 12/16/24 at 9:50 AM, the flour scoop was observed in the flour bin and the handle was visibly touching the flour. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Dec 19, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to utilize an official form for code status (official portable Do Not Resuscitate [DNR] or Medical Order for Scope of Treatment [MOST] form) recognized by emergency medical services and pursuant to North Carolina (NC) general statute for residents who chose a code status of DNR (did not want chest compressions if their heart stopped beating) for 5 of 24 residents (Resident #52, #51, #73, #20, and #43) reviewed for advance directives. The findings included: The North Carolina Office of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) website indicated the following: Pursuant to N.C. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Dec 19, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to discard expired eye drops from the medication carts as specified by the manufacturer's guidelines and failed to remove expired over the counter (OTC) medications from the medication cart in accordance with the manufacturer's expiration date for 2 of 7 medication carts (600 halls and 700 halls). The findings included: a. The manufacturer's package inserts for Latanoprost eye drops revealed an unopened bottle should be stored under refrigeration between the temperature of 36 to 46 Fahrenheit (F) and protected from light. Once it was opened, Latanoprost could be stored at room temperature up to 77 F for up to six weeks. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 27, 2023

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to remove expired food in 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators. The facility failed to clean and maintain 1 of 4 ice machines. This practice had the potential to affect food and beverages served to residents. Findings Included: On [DATE] at 08:22 AM an observation of the walk-in refrigerator with the Dietary Manager (DM) was conducted. The observation revealed one 4-quart container closed with a lid labeled tuna salad with the dates ,d+[DATE] use by ,d+[DATE] located on the second shelf of the walk-in refrigerator. The container was ,d+[DATE] full, and was immediately removed by the DM. The DM stated on [DATE] at 8:36 AM the tuna salad should not have been in the walk-in refrigerator. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF867Jul 27, 2023

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assurance Activity (QAA) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee had previously put into place following the facility's [DATE] recertification survey. The failure was related to one deficiency that was originally cited during the [DATE] recertification survey and was cited on the current recertification and complaint survey of [DATE]. The recited deficiency was in the area of food safety requirements to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 38 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 19, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Jul 27, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Sep 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Feb 16, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jan 13, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2015Standard1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Oct 30, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Sep 10, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2013—6 findings
  • May 10, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 24, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction