Medina Memorial Hospital SNF

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Medina Memorial Hospital SNF, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jun 24, 2026

  Based on interview and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure there were services of a Registered Nurse for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week, unless waived. Specifically, the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse coverage on 05/24/2026, 05/31/2026, 06/07/2026, and 06/20/2026, and the facility did not have a waiver.The findings include:The Facility Assessment Tool, last updated 2/21/2026, documented the facility was licensed to provide care for 30 residents, and the average daily census was 29-30. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Aug 2, 2022

  Based on interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey conducted 7/28/22 through 8/2/22, the facility did not use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Specifically, one of one resident care unit (skilled nursing facility (SNF) independent of the hospital) reviewed for staffing revealed an RN was not scheduled for eight consecutive hours per day on the weekends and holidays for the past four months. The finding is: Review of a facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled RN Staffing for [NAME] Memorial Hospital SNF dated 9/1/2020 documented an RN will be scheduled to be on the SNF unit for eight consecutive hours/day, seven days a week. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF585Jun 24, 2026

  Based on interviews and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, there was no grievance form filed and there was lack of follow-through and resolution for Resident #2's reported missing property. The findings include: The policy titled Patient Complaint/Grievance Protocol, last reviewed on 4/1/2020 documented the facility was committed to providing the best care possible and recognizes patient satisfaction as an important indicator of quality outcome. Prompt investigation and remedy of complaints will occur. Investigation will occur in a fair and equitable manner to protect the rights and due process of patients. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578May 24, 2024

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on [DATE], the facility did not ensure the system developed for advance directives was implemented in a manner that was consistent with residents' wishes for three (Resident #6, #21, and #24) of 16 residents reviewed for advance directives. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that all advance directive identifiers were consistent with the resident's advance directives. Facility staff were utilizing a process that was not consistent with the facilities current documented processes. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604May 24, 2024

  Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 5/24/24, the facility did not ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, used for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints for three (Resident #9,23, and 24) of three residents reviewed for physical restraints. Specifically, Residents #9, #23 and #24 had no assessments for the initiation or ongoing re-evaluation of the continued use of position change alarms. Additionally, there were no provider orders or notes to address the medical reason that warranted the use of the device. […]