Canterbury Woods
Williamsville, New York · CCN 335816
11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 31
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Erie
- Medicare-certified since
- 1999
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 8, 2025
670 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.48 | 4.69 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.70 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.4% | 36.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D555.6% | E222.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B111.1% | C111.1% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Canterbury Woods, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF600Jan 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00362317) completed on an Extended Recertification survey with an exit date of 1/8/2025, the facility failed to protect the residents rights to be free from verbal and physical abuse by a Companion Aide for one (Resident #22) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, a Companion Aide was witnessed by facility staff being verbally and physically abusive towards Resident #22. The facility did not review/revise abuse processes/protocols since 2016. In addition, the facility did not consistently implement their protocols regarding Companion Aides. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Jun 2, 2023
Based on interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 6/2/23, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures for screening employees that would prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for four (Employees A, B, D, and F) of six agency employees reviewed who were hired in the last four months and were subject to the New York State Nurse Aide Registry. Specifically, the facility did not ensure prospective employees were screened through the New York State Nurse Aide Registry prior to their employment. This affected two (North Unit and West Unit) of two resident units. The findings are: 1a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 2, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed 6/2/23, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, one of one main kitchen had issues with multiple food items in the walk-in coolers and a reach-in cooler that had been removed from the original (mother) container or had been opened and were not dated with the date opened. The reach-in freezer in the kitchen had loose French fries, onion rings and many crumbs of debris on the bottom. In addition, one of one servery, Cook #1 was observed serving food without changing gloves during the entire meal service. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Jan 8, 2025
Based on interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00362317) completed on an Extended Recertification survey with an exit date of 1/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, and mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the administrator and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident #22) of six reviewed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Jan 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Extended Recertification survey completed on 1/8/25, the facility did not ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers (ulcers on the skin due to prolong pressure) received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent infection for one (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, there were lack of consistent weekly pressure ulcer assessments and ongoing monitoring for Resident #13's left heel and left buttock pressure ulcers, the assessments did not consistently include staging, measurements of size (length x width x depth), or a description of the wounds. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 8, 2025Standard5 findings
- Jun 2, 2023Standard2 findings
- Dec 30, 2021Standard2 findings
- Oct 31, 2019Standard1 finding
- Nov 6, 2018Standard5 findings
- Feb 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Sep 8, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings
- Aug 8, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Jul 9, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—4 findings
- Aug 24, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction