Deficiency Index

The Knolls

Valhalla, New York · CCN 335844

6 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
25
Surveys
6
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2012–2021
’12’15’20’21
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/6

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
20
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Westchester
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 6, 2021

1,952 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.704.69
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.78—
Annual nurse turnover24.0%36.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E112.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 25 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Knolls, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 6, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure proper storage of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1) perishable foods were not labeled and dated, 2) foods were not discarded by use by date, and 3) dry goods were not stored in closed containers. .A facility policy and procedure titled Labeling and Dating, dated [DATE] and last revised on [DATE], included but was not limited to: All food items must be labeled with either a manufacturers label or handwritten label. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jul 6, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive person-centered care plans with measurable goals and interventions were reviewed and revised for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #63) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, (1) A Pharmacy Drug Review was conducted for Resident #63 and revealed a drug-drug interaction of concurrent use of Aspirin and [MEDICATION(S)] medication may increase the risk of bleeding and to monitor the resident; (2) There was no documented evidence the residents' care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect the drug-drug interactions as identified by the Pharmacist; (3) There was no evidence these changes were communicated among the nursing staff for ongoing… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jul 6, 2021

    Based on interview and observation conducted during a recertification survey, it could not be ensured that the facility provided care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that a change in skin condition was reported and treated timely for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure). The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Skin Care/Personal Grooming, dated 1/15/2002 and revised 12/2014 documented: Certified Nursimg Assistant (CNA) responsibility during AM bed bath, shower, or tub bath, inspects resident's skin for any redness, dryness, cracking, etc. Report any finding to Nurse. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF692Jul 6, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that facility staff accurately measured a resident's fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. Specifically,fluid restriction related to abnormal lab values was not followed for one of one resident (Resident #64) reviewed for hydration. Facility staff members did not accurately measure the resident's fluid intake during a recent lunch observation. The findings are: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF756Jul 6, 2021

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the irregularities identified by the Pharmacist were communicated to the resident's primary medical doctor and acted upon. Specifically, monitoring of the Resident's blood levels of [MEDICATION(S)] did not occur in accordance with the physician's orders. This was evident for 1 (Resident #7) out of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. The finding is: An undated facility policy and procedure titled Drug Regimen Review revealed: The consultant pharmacist reviews the physician's orders, lab test result, nurse's notes, physician's notes, and resident's background in performing drug regimen reviews of each resident on a monthly basis; identifies a possible… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 25 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 6, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Jul 3, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Mar 28, 2017Standard7 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 12, 2016Standard3 findings
  • May 31, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 28, 2012—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction