Deficiency Index

Penn Yan Manor Nursing Home Inc

Penn Yan, New York · CCN 335494

11 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
52
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2024
’10’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Yates · rural
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 25, 2024

928 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.684.69
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover36.0%36.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD964.3%E214.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B321.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 52 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Penn Yan Manor Nursing Home Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Aug 5, 2022

    Based on interview and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 8/5/22, it was determined that the facility did not implement written policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property related to screening prospective employees. Specifically, a Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) abuse screening was not completed prior to hire for four out of five employee files reviewed. The findings are: 1. On 8/4/22 from 10:34 a.m. to 11:45 a.m. the surveyor was provided documentation related to five newly hired employees. The files included Employees #1, #4 and #5 were hired as: Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) and Employee #2, was hired as a Housekeeper. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF814Aug 5, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 8/5/22, it was determined that for one of one kitchen the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. Specifically, the garbage dumpster outside the facility was not equipped with a tight-fitting lid, door, or cover. This is evidenced by the following: Observations during the follow-up kitchen tour on 8/4/22 at approximately 11:55 a.m., revealed a large rectangular open-top roll-off garbage dumpster outside the facility located outside the nearby hospital kitchen where the facility meals are prepared. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF661Apr 25, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure that the completion of a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the residents stay, a final summary of the resident's status and a post-discharge plan was completed for one (Resident #40) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, the resident was discharged without a complete discharge summary to ensure the facility communicated the necessary information to the resident, the continuing care provided and the resident representative (if applicable) at the time of discharge. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF557Aug 5, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey completed on 8/5/22, it was determined that for one (Resident #13) of five residents reviewed during dining, the facility did not ensure that the resident received care in a respectful and dignified manner during meals. Specifically, Resident #13 did not receive timely assistance with eating. This is evidenced by the following: Resident #13 had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, [CONDITION(S)], dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/19/22, documented that Resident #13 had severe impairment of cognitive skills and was totally dependent on staff for eating. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Aug 5, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, completed on 8/5/22, it was determined that for 3 (Residents #29, #17 and #19) of 13 residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure that the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advance directive would be honored. Specifically, the color-coded name plates at the entrance of the residents' rooms did not match the wishes documented on the residents' Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST). Review of the undated facility policy Advance Directives, indicated; if a resident has executed an advance directive, it will be displayed prominently in the medical record and reflected in the resident's care plan. 1. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 52 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 25, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Jan 20, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Jun 9, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Apr 7, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jan 30, 2014—5 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Nov 28, 2012—4 findings
  • Dec 16, 2011—11 findings
  • Nov 24, 2010—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction