Nottingham R H C F
Jamesville, New York · CCN 335800
11 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 46
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Onondaga
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 12, 2025
423 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.85 | 4.69 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.68 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.2% | 36.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D8100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Nottingham R H C F, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Sep 12, 2025
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 9/8/2025 - 9/12/2025, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #23) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #23 did not have a positioning device placed as ordered. Findings include:The facility was unable to provide a policy referencing positional devices. Resident #23 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia and pain in the right-hand joints. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Mar 7, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey conducted 3/04/2024-3/07/2024, the facility did not care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (Residents #21) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #21 did not receive regular foot care and their toenails were long and uncomfortable for the resident. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Rights & Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revised 8/8/2022, documented all residents of the facility had a right to a dignified existence and would be supported by the facility in exercising their rights. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Mar 7, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/7/2024, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 1 treatment cart. Specifically, the treatment cart was unlocked and contained scissors and potentially hazardous medications in an area accessible to residents. Findings include: The facility policy Storage of Medications, revised 8/2000, documented medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly, and accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Mar 7, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/7/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #9 was not administered oxygen as ordered and did not have a care plan that included oxygen. Findings include: The facility policy, Oxygen Therapy dated 11/2023 documented oxygen could be administered by a licensed nurse and all as needed oxygen use will include the number of hours used on the shift under the supplemental documentation on the treatment administration record. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF882Mar 7, 2024
Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted 3/4/2024-3/7/2024, the facility did not ensure the designated Infection Preventionists completed specialized training in infection prevention and control for 2 of 2 Infection Preventionists (Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing). Specifically, the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing who shared the role of Infection Preventionist, did not have documented evidence of a certificate of completion or equivalent documentation to meet the requirement for specialized training in infection prevention and control. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 46 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 12, 2025Standard1 finding
- Mar 7, 2024Standard4 findings
- Dec 3, 2021Standard3 findings
- Sep 27, 2019Standard2 findings
- Apr 10, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 19, 2016Standard10 findings
- Dec 30, 2014Standard5 findings
- Nov 14, 2013—5 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Nov 19, 2012—7 findings
- Dec 21, 2011—4 findings
- Oct 14, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction