Deficiency Index

Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing

Salt Lake City, Utah · CCN 46A058

17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
135
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
36
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Salt Lake
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 25 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Utah.

Last survey on record

Jun 4, 2026

158 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.284.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover72.4%57.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$3,496 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG511.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3168.9%E817.8%F12.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 45 of the 135 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6282×

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Maple Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 4, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 19 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and supervision required to maintain a safe environment for a resident with known impulsivity and severe cognitive impairment. This failure occurred when a Registered Nurse (RN) left a medication cart unlocked and unattended, in direct violation of facility policy and the resident's specific care plan interventions dated 9/17/25. This breach in safety protocols allowed the resident to access the unsecured cart and ingest multiple medications not prescribed to him. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF761Jun 4, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store all medications in a locked compartment and limit access only to authorized staff. Specifically, for 1 of 19 sampled residents, a resident was able to access the medication cart that was unlocked and unattended in a public hallway, allowing the resident to obtain multiple medications blister packs, and possibly ingest of unauthorized medication. This resulted in a finding of harm. Resident Identifier: 32.Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included human immunodeficiency virus, paranoid schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder.Review of resident 32's medical record was completed on 6/1/26 through 6/4/26.On 3/13/25 at 12:10 PM, an Event… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Sep 13, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record the review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 18 sampled residents, a resident that was observed and verbally expressed their pain was not provided pain medication. In addition, there was a delay in the facility Medical Doctor (MD) responding to the nurses message regarding resident 33's pain. Resident identifier: 33. Findings included: On 9/10/23 at 11:43 AM, an observation of resident 33 was conducted. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 15, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 4 of 28 sample resident, that the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to be free from abuse. Specifically, there were two residents involved in four altercations that resulted in one resident sustaining a dislocated finger. In addition, another resident was found with his pants down with another resident touching him. The facility determined the residents with cognitive impairment and mental illness diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility did not evaluate if other residents were at risk for being sexually abused by the perpetrator. Both of the above incidents were cited at a harm level. Resident identifiers: 1, 11, 15, 20, 27 and 133. Findings include: A. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 15, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident sustained multiple falls which resulted in facial lacerations. The incident will be cited at a harm level. The same resident had a successful elopement from the facility and sustained a fall. In addition, an another resident sustained a fall after a [CONDITION(S)] which resulted in a fracture. Resident identifiers 4 and 15. Findings included: 1. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 135 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 4, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 2, 2025Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Mar 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2023Standard2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 15, 2021Standard16 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 28, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 28, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Aug 5, 2019Standard and complaint23 findings
  • May 24, 2018Standard22 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 15, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Dec 3, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Oct 9, 2013—8 findings
  • Oct 23, 2012—11 findings
  • Aug 20, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2010—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction