Deficiency Index

Pine Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing

Salt Lake City, Utah · CCN 46A064

17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
121
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
34
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Salt Lake
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 25 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Utah.

Last survey on record

Oct 9, 2025

396 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.814.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.75—
Annual nurse turnover80.0%57.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$56,121 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ24.9%K—L—
Actual harmG12.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2561.0%E1229.3%F12.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 121 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7573×

    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6092×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pine Creek Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Oct 3, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 out of 28 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, the facility failed to promptly identify, monitor, and intervene for an acute change in condition after two residents sustained a fall. Additionally, one resident did not have neurological assessments completed status post fall, and the other resident did not have timely intervention after changes were identified on the neurological assessment. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 3, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident had adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was not secured inside the facility vehicle during transport and fell out of her wheelchair. The fall resulted in the resident sustaining a Thoracic (T)11-T12 fracture and a contusion of the abdominal wall. Based on the facility's investigation and corresponding corrective measures, this was cited at past non-compliance with a correction date of 8/1/23. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 27, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 3 out of 23 sampled residents, a resident sustained multiple falls with one fall resulting in a head laceration that required staples. This example of non-compliance was cited at a HARM level. Additionally, a resident eloped from the facility and was located by police approximately 3-4 hours after leaving the facility and resident had multiple falls without new interventions identified to prevent future falls. Resident identifiers: 12, 13, and 15.Findings included:HARM1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF740Oct 3, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 28 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Specifically, a resident with a history of suicidal ideations (SI) was hospitalized for a suicidal attempt and did not have behavioral health services provided for more than 2 months after the hospitalization . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Oct 9, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Specifically, the facility did not always have a registered nurse at least 8 consecutive hours on certain weekends.Findings Included: Findings Included:The facility's staffing schedules from September 2025 to October 2025 were reviewed.-There was no RN scheduled on 9/14/25.-There was no RN scheduled on 9/28/25.On 10/8/25 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that they did not need to have a registered nurse scheduled on every shift. The DON stated that they did not do admissions on the weekends and if the residents needed an assessment completed the nurse would call her. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 121 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 9, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Oct 3, 2024Standard and complaint28 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 2, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Aug 18, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Oct 21, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2019Standard17 findings · 1 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Jun 12, 2018Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Feb 23, 2017Standard24 findings · 8 harm
  • Dec 1, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Mar 31, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 30, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2013—3 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—6 findings
  • Oct 5, 2011—2 findings
  • Aug 18, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction