Deficiency Index

Manor at St Luke Village,The

Hazleton, Pennsylvania · CCN 395636

31 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
183
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
104
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AVARDIS HEALTH
County
Luzerne
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Jan 8, 2026

305 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.603.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.55—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2060.6%E927.3%F39.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 183 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5652×

    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5591×

    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.

  • F5671×

    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Manor at St Luke Village,The, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 12, 2022

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility provided documentation, select investigative reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide necessary assistance devices and/or utilize safe technique while performing activities of daily living (showering/bathing) to prevent a fall resulting in serious injuries, a fractured left femur and sacrum, for one out of 4 sampled residents (Resident CR 2). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of muscle weakness, [CONDITION(S)] (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids),… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 25, 2022

    Based on review of clinical records and select resident incident/accident reports and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide adequate staff supervision and assistance and implement appropriate interventions based on individual resident needs to promote resident safety and prevent falls resulting in a serious injury, a [CONDITION(S)], for one of 4 sampled (Residents CR1). Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed that Resident CR1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803Jan 8, 2026

    Based on a review of the facility's planned menu, weekly menu cycle, and menu extensions, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure planned menus were sufficiently reviewed and updated to provide adequate variety and to prevent repetitive meal selections in accordance with resident preferences which affected 5 out of 8 residents interviewed, who reported experiencing repetitive meals and limited variation in menu selections that did not reflect their stated food preferences.Findings included: During a Resident Council meeting conducted on January 6, 2026, at 10:00 AM, concerns were raised regarding the lack of variety in the facility's menu. Residents, 34 and 70, indicated that they have a problem with the variety of options on the menu. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 28, 2025

    Based on observations, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs and infection control and prevention policy and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive infection control program to prevent the spread of infectious diseases including upper respiratory infection for 1 of 23 residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of the facility's infection control policy, last revised on January 23, 2025, indicated that the policy was designed to facilitate a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment while preventing and managing the transmission of infectious diseases The objectives of the infection control policies and practices were to: a. Prevent, detect, investigate and control infections in the facility. b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725May 31, 2024

    Based on a review of nurse staffing, clinical records, grievances lodged with the facility and the minutes from Residents Council meetings and staff, resident and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide timely and quality of care to residents, and in accordance with each resident's plan of care, to meet individualized needs and promote the resident's health and well-being. Findings included: A review of grievances filed with the facility revealed a grievance dated March 9, 2024, indicating that Resident 199 was not offered a shower because facility staff told her that they were too short {of staff} to give her a shower. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 183 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 8, 2026Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Jun 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Jan 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Nov 16, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 28, 2023Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Feb 7, 2023Complaint4 findings
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Dec 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 20, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Apr 12, 2022Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 25, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 19, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Jul 20, 2021Standard7 findings
  • Mar 23, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 2, 2020Standard4 findings
  • May 17, 2019Standard18 findings
  • Mar 27, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 1, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • May 12, 2017Standard20 findings
  • Mar 20, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 21, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Dec 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 8, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Apr 10, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Nov 1, 2013—2 findings
  • May 16, 2013—5 findings
  • Apr 5, 2012—7 findings
  • May 27, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 10, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction