Little Sisters of the Poor
Saint Paul, Minnesota · CCN 245524
14 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 51
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 73
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Ramsey
- Medicare-certified since
- 1988
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jan 28, 2026
285 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.95 | 4.39 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.74 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.9% | 37.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,265 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.4% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1551.7% | E413.8% | F620.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C310.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6281×
Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
- F6571×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Little Sisters of the Poor, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF812Aug 23, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure unpasteurized eggs were fully cooked and prepared in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for 1 of 1 residents (R19) who consumed the undercooked, unpasteurized eggs and 10 of 10 residents (R10, R13, R20, R25, R27, R29, R46, R47, R56, R157) who were identified to routinely consume undercooked eggs and had an increased risk of contracting a potentially life-threatening food borne illness. The facility also failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with safe food handling practices to prevent food borne illnesses and to store food in a manner to prevent biological, chemical, or physical contamination. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 3, 2024
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to identify, comprehensively assess, implement individualized interventions for wandering, exit seeking behaviors, and elopement for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) who had a history of repeated exit seeking behaviors. The facility's failures resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 eloped from the facility, was found on a city street, and returned by a passerby. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] after R1 attempted elopement multiple times, the facility failed to complete comprehensive wandering/elopement assessments, monitoring system, and appropriate intervention resulting in R1's actual elopement on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 11, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure open refrigerated items were dated and covered. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure expired items were removed from storage. This had the potential to impact all 32 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An observation on [DATE] at 11:40 a.m., the main kitchen was reviewed. A walk-in refrigerator contained an open package of Hillshire Farm sliced turkey lunchmeat. The lunchmeat was wrapped in saran wrap and had no label or date. At 11:57 a.m., the walk-in dairy refrigerator was reviewed. The refrigerator contained 4 half gallons of [NAME] 2% milk. The best by date for all 4 containers was [DATE]. Dietary aide (DA)-A verified the expired milk and stated they should be thrown away. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF837Oct 3, 2024
Based on interview and document review, the facility's governing body failed to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility and further failed to ensure the administrator reported to and was held accountable to the governing body. This had to effect all current and future residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Policies: During a review of facility policies, the facility was unable to provide a copy of numerous requested policies which included: policy on physician visits, including frequency; policy on emergency physician care; policy on physician delegation of tasks; policy on physician delegation of dietary orders; policy on governing body; policy on communication between administrator and governing body; policy on… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Oct 3, 2024
49338 Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment (FA) was complete and included an evaluation of the resident population and its needs using evidence-based data driven methods, the competencies and skill sets for all personnel necessary to provide that care, information on staffing levels needed based on the resident population, a plan for maximizing recruitment and retention of direct care staff, and all contracted services required to meet resident needs. The facility further failed to ensure the FA was conducted with input from all necessary individuals. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 51 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 28, 2026Standard3 findings
- Dec 11, 2024Standard6 findings
- Oct 3, 2024Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 1, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
- Oct 4, 2023Complaint5 findings
- Nov 10, 2022Standard7 findings
- Aug 23, 2021Standard4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- May 6, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Dec 15, 2016Standard6 findings
- Feb 5, 2015Standard1 finding
- Mar 5, 2014Standard1 finding
- May 9, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 10, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction