Deficiency Index

Oak Hills Living Center

New Ulm, Minnesota · CCN 245490

20 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
74
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
94
Ownership
Non profit - Other
Chain
Independent
County
Brown · rural
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Apr 8, 2026

215 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.274.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.03—
Annual nurse turnover39.0%37.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,433 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ220.0%K—L—
Actual harmG110.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD660.0%E—F110.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 74 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6561×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6841×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oak Hills Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess each fall and identify causal factors to determine reason for falls, identify potential effective interventions to decrease the risk for falls, failed to comprehensively evaluate and implement fall interventions for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for falls. The facility's failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy for R1 who sustained a right hip fracture from the 9th fall. The IJ began on 3/28/24, when the facility failed to complete a comprehensive causal analysis, and implement appropriate interventions after R1 self-transferred to the bathroom resulting in his 9th fall from self-transfers which subsequently resulted in, hospitalization , and right hip fracture with surgical repair. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 13, 2023

    Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to safely use a mechanical lift per manufacture instruction to transfer 1 of 1 residents (R2) who required a mechanical lift for transfers. This resulted in R2 falling from a lift, sustaining major injuries. R2 subsequently died 10 days following the fall. In addition the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to determine the cause of the fall from the lift. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R2. The IJ began on [DATE], at approximately 9:30 a.m. when R2 fell from the lift during a transfer sustaining a major head injury and right upper arm fracture after two nursing assistants (NAs) were transferring a resident using the mechanical lift. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 18, 2023

    Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who despite being at risk for elopement and wearing an elopement security band, left the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge. This resulted in immediate jeopardy when R1 walked 218 yards across uneven terrain into a parking lot of a neighboring apartment complex placing him at risk for serious harm, impairment, or death. The immediate jeopardy began on 5/4/23 at 3:25 p.m., when R1 left the facility unsupervised and was identified on 5/4/23 at 3:55 p.m., when the facility was notified by a tenant at the neighboring apartment complex and the facility arrived to pick up R1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 18, 2025

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to implement a known safety intervention of a gait belt when ambulating a resident to prevent accident hazards for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who had a fall with major injury. This resulted in harm when R1 sustained a femur fracture. The facility corrected the deficiency prior to the survey, so the citation was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 5/23/25, identified diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (condition that affects how the body uses insulin and sugar), peripheral vascular disease (narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the arms or legs), absence of right foot, edema (swelling), and open-angle glaucoma (gradual vision loss leading to blindness). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 13, 2023

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a water management program consistent with nationally accepted standards, e.g., ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) or CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). This had the potential to effect all 83 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: During an interview on 12/13/23 at 9:53 a.m., maintenance worker (MW)-A stated he was responsible for the facility water management program. MW-A explained the actions he took related to the water management program which included testing water for chlorine levels, measuring water temperatures at various sites in the facility, and running water in vacant resident rooms. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 74 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 8, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jun 18, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 12, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 13, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 18, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 25, 2022Standard11 findings
  • Jul 21, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Jan 16, 2020Standard7 findings
  • Nov 29, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Oct 19, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Oct 15, 2015Standard8 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 3, 2015Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 20, 2014Standard5 findings
  • May 15, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Nov 4, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 28, 2013—6 findings
  • Apr 29, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction